VulnerabilityPublished 10 Aug 2025Updated 13 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-8793: LitmusChaos Litmus · Improper Control of Resource Identifiers

Affects LitmusChaos LitmusSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 38% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
LitmusChaos Litmus	Affected 3.0 – 3.19.0 20 affected builds	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Since no official patches or updates have been released by the vendor, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Restrict network access to LitmusChaos management interfaces to trusted internal networks only, using network segmentation and firewall rules. 2) Implement strict access controls and monitoring on the usage of the 'projectID' parameter to detect anomalous or unauthorized requests. 3) Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or Web Application Firewalls (WAF) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious manipulation of resource identifiers. 4) Conduct thorough audits of chaos experiment configurations to ensure no sensitive or production-critical resources are exposed or accessible via manipulated identifiers. 5) Monitor public vulnerability disclosures and subscribe to LitmusChaos community channels for any forthcoming patches or official guidance. 6) Consider temporary suspension or isolation of LitmusChaos deployments in high-risk environments until a patch is available. 7) Enhance logging and alerting around LitmusChaos API calls to identify potential exploitation attempts early.

Description

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in LitmusChaos Litmus up to 3.19.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument projectID leads to improper control of resource identifiers. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations utilizing LitmusChaos for chaos engineering and resilience testing, this vulnerability could allow attackers to manipulate project identifiers remotely, potentially leading to unauthorized access or modification of chaos experiments or related resources. This could disrupt testing workflows, cause inaccurate resilience assessments, or in worst cases, lead to indirect impacts on production environments if chaos experiments are misconfigured or manipulated maliciously. Given the growing adoption of cloud-native technologies and Kubernetes in Europe, organizations relying on LitmusChaos may face operational risks, especially in sectors where continuous testing and reliability are critical, such as finance, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not immediately catastrophic, it could be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain or to gain footholds in development or testing environments, which may later be escalated to more severe compromises.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 18 Aug 2025, 00:57 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats