CVE-2025-9263VulnerabilityPublished 20 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-9263: Xuxueli xxl-job · Improper Control of Resource Identifiers

Affects Xuxueli xxl-jobSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Xuxueli xxl-job	Affected =3.1.0 =3.1.1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately audit their deployments of xxl-job to identify affected versions (3.1.0 and 3.1.1). Until an official patch is released, organizations should implement strict network-level access controls to restrict access to the xxl-job administrative interfaces, limiting exposure to trusted internal networks only. Employing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block anomalous jobGroup parameter values can reduce exploitation risk. Additionally, review and tighten authorization checks within the application to ensure that jobGroup parameters are validated against user permissions before processing. Monitoring logs for unusual access patterns or repeated attempts to manipulate jobGroup parameters can provide early detection of exploitation attempts. Organizations should also engage with the vendor or community to track patch releases and apply updates promptly once available. Finally, consider isolating the xxl-job service in segmented network zones to minimize potential lateral movement if exploited.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in Xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.1.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function getJobsByGroup of the file /src/main/java/com/xxl/job/admin/controller/JobLogController.java. Such manipulation of the argument jobGroup leads to improper control of resource identifiers. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using xxl-job versions 3.1.0 or 3.1.1, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized access or manipulation of job scheduling and logging data. Given that xxl-job is a distributed task scheduling framework commonly used in enterprise environments for job automation, exploitation could lead to disruption of automated workflows, exposure of sensitive operational data, or unauthorized job execution control. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise system confidentiality or availability, the ability to manipulate resource identifiers remotely with low complexity and no user interaction could facilitate lateral movement or privilege escalation in complex environments. This risk is particularly relevant for industries relying heavily on automated job scheduling such as manufacturing, finance, and IT services prevalent in Europe. The public availability of exploit code increases the urgency for European organizations to assess their exposure and implement mitigations to prevent potential exploitation that could disrupt critical business processes or leak operational data.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 28 Aug 2025, 01:30 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats