VulnerabilityPublished 20 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-9264: Xuxueli xxl-job · Improper Control of Resource Identifiers

Affects Xuxueli xxl-jobSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 29% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Xuxueli xxl-job	Affected =3.1.0 =3.1.1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation should include restricting network access to the xxl-job admin interface to trusted IP addresses and internal networks only, minimizing exposure to remote attackers.
Implement strict authentication and authorization controls around job management endpoints, ensuring only authorized personnel can invoke the remove function.
Monitor logs for unusual or unauthorized job removal attempts to detect exploitation attempts early.
If possible, upgrade to a newer, patched version of xxl-job once available from the vendor.
In the absence of an official patch, consider applying custom input validation or filtering on the ID parameter at the web application firewall (WAF) or reverse proxy level to block suspicious requests.
Conduct a thorough audit of existing scheduled jobs to identify critical tasks and prepare contingency plans for rapid restoration if disruption occurs.
Educate operational teams about the vulnerability and establish incident response procedures specific to job scheduler compromise.

Description

A vulnerability was found in Xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.1.1. Affected by this issue is the function remove of the file /src/main/java/com/xxl/job/admin/controller/JobInfoController.java of the component Jobs Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument ID results in improper control of resource identifiers. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Impact

For European organizations using xxl-job for job scheduling, this vulnerability poses a risk to operational continuity and integrity of automated workflows. Disruption or unauthorized deletion of scheduled jobs can lead to missed critical business processes, data processing delays, or cascading failures in dependent systems. Industries with high reliance on automation, such as manufacturing, finance, and telecommunications, may experience service degradation or outages. Since exploitation requires no user interaction and can be performed remotely, attackers could leverage this vulnerability to cause denial of service or sabotage internal processes. The medium CVSS score reflects moderate risk, but the availability of public exploit code increases urgency. Organizations in Europe with deployments of xxl-job versions 3.1.0 or 3.1.1 should consider this a significant operational threat, especially where job scheduling is integral to business functions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 28 Aug 2025, 01:31 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats