VulnerabilityPublished 25 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-9404: Scada-LTS · Cross-site Scripting

Affects Scada-LTSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.8 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

4.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Scada-LTS	Affected =2.7.8.0 =2.7.8.1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Immediate upgrade to a patched version of Scada-LTS once available, or apply vendor-provided workarounds if patches are delayed. 2) Implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data, especially the 'Title' parameter in the /pointHierarchySLTS endpoint, to prevent script injection. 3) Restrict access to the SCADA management interfaces to trusted networks and enforce strong network segmentation to limit exposure. 4) Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block XSS payloads targeting the vulnerable endpoint. 5) Conduct user awareness training focusing on phishing and social engineering to reduce the risk of user interaction exploitation. 6) Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual activity related to the Folder Handler component or suspicious script execution attempts. 7) Consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate the impact of injected scripts. These measures combined will reduce the likelihood and impact of exploitation beyond generic patching advice.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /pointHierarchySLTS of the component Folder Handler. The manipulation of the argument Title leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Impact

For European organizations using Scada-LTS, particularly those in critical infrastructure sectors such as energy, water management, and industrial automation, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized script execution within the management interface. Successful exploitation could lead to theft of session tokens, unauthorized commands, or manipulation of displayed data, undermining operational integrity and potentially causing misinformation or operational disruptions. Given the reliance on SCADA systems for essential services, even medium-severity vulnerabilities can have outsized impacts if leveraged in coordinated attacks. The remote exploitability increases the attack surface, especially if the affected endpoints are exposed to less secure network segments or the internet. The requirement for user interaction somewhat limits the attack scope but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where operators may be targeted via phishing or social engineering. The absence of known active exploitation reduces immediate risk but should not lead to complacency, as public exploit availability facilitates rapid weaponization.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 25 Aug 2025, 03:17 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats