CVE-2025-9417VulnerabilityPublished 25 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-9417: itsourcecode Apartment Management System · SQL Injection

Affects itsourcecode Apartment Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 40% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecode Apartment Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Immediately audit and restrict access controls to the Apartment Management System, ensuring only trusted personnel have authenticated access. 2) Apply input validation and parameterized queries or prepared statements in the /employee/addemployee.php script to prevent SQL injection. 3) If vendor patches are unavailable, consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection patterns targeting the vulnerable parameter. 4) Conduct thorough code reviews and penetration testing focusing on SQL injection vectors within the system. 5) Monitor logs for suspicious database query patterns or unauthorized access attempts. 6) Plan for an upgrade or replacement of the vulnerable system version as soon as a patch or secure version becomes available. 7) Ensure compliance with GDPR by encrypting sensitive data at rest and in transit to minimize exposure in case of a breach.

Description

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Apartment Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /employee/addemployee.php. This manipulation of the argument ID causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations using the itsourcecode Apartment Management System 1.0, this vulnerability could lead to significant data breaches involving sensitive tenant and employee information. Unauthorized access to the database could expose personal data, violating GDPR regulations and resulting in legal and financial penalties. Data integrity could be compromised, affecting operational reliability and trustworthiness of the management system. Availability could also be impacted if attackers execute destructive SQL commands, potentially disrupting apartment management services. Given the medium severity and the requirement for some level of authenticated access, the threat is more pronounced for insiders or attackers who have obtained credentials. The public availability of exploit code increases the urgency for European organizations to assess and mitigate this risk promptly to avoid reputational damage and regulatory consequences.

Summary

CVE-2025-9417 is a SQL Injection vulnerability identified in version 1.0 of the itsourcecode Apartment Management System, specifically within the /employee/addemployee.php file. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization or validation of the 'ID' parameter, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL code. This injection flaw enables remote attackers to manipulate backend database queries without requiring authentication or user interaction, as indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/UI:N/PR:L). The vulnerability impacts the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the database by potentially allowing unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion. Although the CVSS score is medium (5.3), the exploit has been publicly disclosed, increasing the risk of exploitation. The vulnerability requires low privileges (PR:L), meaning an attacker needs some level of authenticated access but no user interaction is needed. The scope is limited to the Apartment Management System version 1.0, and no patches have been published yet. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests limited active exploitation currently, but public availability of the exploit code raises the likelihood of future attacks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 25 Aug 2025, 20:32 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats