CVE-2025-9514VulnerabilityPublished 27 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-9514: macrozheng mall · Weak Password Requirements

Affects macrozheng mallSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 33% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: The successful attack depends on the evasion or circumvention of security-enhancing techniques in place that would otherwise hinder the attack. These include: Evasion of exploit mitigation techniques, for example, circumvention of address space randomization (ASLR) or data execution prevention (DEP) must be performed for the attack to be successful; Obtaining target-specific secrets. The attacker must gather some target-specific secret before the attack can be successful. A secret is any piece of information that cannot be obtained through any amount of reconnaissance. To obtain the secret the attacker must perform additional attacks or break otherwise secure measures (e.g. knowledge of a secret key may be needed to break a crypto channel). This operation must be performed for each attacked target.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
macrozheng mall	Affected =1.0.0 =1.0.1 =1.0.2 =1.0.3	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately assess their use of macrozheng mall software and identify any instances running affected versions (1.0.0 through 1.0.3). In the absence of official patches, organizations should implement compensating controls such as enforcing strong password policies at the application or network level, including minimum complexity, length, and use of multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all accounts. Monitoring registration logs for suspicious activity, such as multiple account creations from the same IP or weak password patterns, can help detect exploitation attempts. Restricting registration functionality to trusted networks or requiring manual approval for new accounts may reduce risk. Organizations should also consider isolating or segmenting systems running macrozheng mall to limit potential lateral movement. Engaging with the vendor for patch timelines or updates and subscribing to vulnerability advisories is critical. Finally, educating users and administrators about the risks of weak passwords and suspicious account activity can improve detection and response capabilities.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in macrozheng mall up to 1.0.3. This impacts an unknown function of the component Registration. Such manipulation leads to weak password requirements. The attack can be executed remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The vendor deleted the GitHub issue for this vulnerability without and explanation.

Impact

For European organizations using macrozheng mall versions up to 1.0.3, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized access through weak password enforcement during registration. If attackers successfully create accounts with weak passwords, they may gain access to sensitive customer or business data, depending on the privileges assigned to these accounts. This could lead to data breaches, fraud, or manipulation of e-commerce operations. The medium severity and high attack complexity somewhat limit immediate widespread exploitation, but targeted attacks against high-value organizations remain a concern. The lack of patches or mitigations increases exposure duration. Organizations in sectors with stringent data protection requirements, such as finance, retail, or healthcare, could face regulatory and reputational damage if exploited. Additionally, attackers might leverage compromised accounts as footholds for further attacks within the network, increasing the overall risk posture.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Aug 2025, 06:32 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats