Skip to main content

CVE-2025-9604: Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key in coze-studio

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-9604cvecve-2025-9604
Published: Fri Aug 29 2025 (08/29/2025, 01:32:09 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Product: coze-studio

Description

A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): "For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt."

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 08/29/2025, 02:02:48 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-9604 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting coze-studio versions up to 0.2.4. The vulnerability arises from the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys within the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go, specifically involving the arguments AuthSecretKey, StateSecretKey, and OAuthTokenSecretKey. Hard-coded keys are a critical security flaw because they can be extracted by attackers, leading to compromise of encrypted data or authentication tokens. In this case, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to exploit the weakness without requiring authentication or user interaction, although the attack complexity is high and exploitability is difficult. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network attack vector (AV:N), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and limited confidentiality impact (VC:L), with no impact on integrity or availability. The vendor has acknowledged the issue and plans to implement user-defined key management and improve encryption practices by adding random salts, which would mitigate the risk by eliminating static keys. No known exploits are currently in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet, but deployment of a patch is recommended once available. This vulnerability highlights the risks of improper cryptographic key management in software development, particularly in encryption modules that protect sensitive data or authentication tokens.

Potential Impact

For European organizations using coze-studio versions 0.2.0 through 0.2.4, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized decryption or token compromise if attackers can extract the hard-coded keys. While the confidentiality impact is limited, exposure of authentication tokens or encryption keys could lead to unauthorized access or data leakage. Given the medium severity and high complexity of exploitation, the immediate risk is moderate but should not be ignored, especially in environments handling sensitive or regulated data. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government, which often use encryption for data protection and authentication, could face compliance issues under GDPR if cryptographic keys are compromised. The remote attack vector means that attackers do not need physical or internal network access, increasing the threat surface. However, the lack of known exploits and difficult exploitability somewhat reduces the immediate threat level. Still, the presence of hard-coded keys is a fundamental security flaw that undermines trust in the software's encryption mechanisms.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should take the following specific steps: 1) Immediately identify any deployments of coze-studio versions 0.2.0 to 0.2.4 within their environments. 2) Monitor vendor communications for the release of patches addressing this vulnerability and prioritize timely patching once available. 3) Until patches are applied, restrict network exposure of coze-studio services to trusted networks only, using firewalls and network segmentation to reduce attack surface. 4) Review and audit cryptographic key management practices in coze-studio configurations, and where possible, override default keys with user-defined keys or environment-specific secrets. 5) Implement additional monitoring and alerting for unusual authentication or encryption-related activities that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6) Conduct security assessments and penetration testing focused on cryptographic modules to detect potential key leakage or misuse. 7) Educate developers and administrators on secure key management principles to prevent recurrence of hard-coded keys in future software versions or customizations.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
VulDB
Date Reserved
2025-08-28T15:13:46.197Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68b106c4ad5a09ad007273f9

Added to database: 8/29/2025, 1:47:48 AM

Last enriched: 8/29/2025, 2:02:48 AM

Last updated: 8/29/2025, 4:08:47 AM

Views: 4

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats