Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-9633: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in shawfactor LH Signing

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-9633cvecve-2025-9633cwe-352
Published: Thu Sep 11 2025 (09/11/2025, 07:25:03 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: shawfactor
Product: LH Signing

Description

The LH Signing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.83. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 02/26/2026, 18:08:26 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-9633 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the LH Signing plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 2.83. The vulnerability stems from the plugin_options function lacking proper nonce validation, which is a security token mechanism designed to verify the legitimacy of requests. Without this validation, attackers can craft malicious requests that, when executed by an authenticated administrator (through social engineering such as clicking a link), result in unauthorized modification of plugin settings. This attack vector does not require the attacker to be authenticated but does require user interaction from an administrator. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of the plugin’s configuration but does not compromise confidentiality or availability. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.3, reflecting a medium severity level due to the ease of exploitation (network attack vector, low attack complexity) but limited impact scope. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability is published and should be addressed promptly. The plugin is used within WordPress environments, which are widely deployed globally, making the vulnerability relevant to many organizations relying on WordPress for content management and digital signing capabilities.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is the unauthorized modification of LH Signing plugin settings, which could lead to misconfiguration, weakening of security controls, or disruption of digital signing processes managed by the plugin. While it does not directly expose sensitive data or cause denial of service, altered plugin settings could indirectly facilitate further attacks or operational issues. Organizations relying on the plugin for document signing or authentication workflows may experience integrity issues, potentially undermining trust in signed content. Since exploitation requires an administrator to interact with a malicious link, the risk is mitigated somewhat by user awareness but remains significant given the potential for social engineering. The widespread use of WordPress and the plugin’s presence in numerous websites globally means that many organizations, especially those with less mature security practices, could be affected. The vulnerability could be leveraged as part of a multi-stage attack chain, increasing its overall risk profile.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately update the LH Signing plugin to a version that includes proper nonce validation once available. Until a patch is released, administrators should be educated about the risks of clicking unsolicited links and phishing attempts that could trigger CSRF attacks. Implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block suspicious POST requests targeting plugin settings endpoints can reduce risk. Restrict administrative access to trusted networks or VPNs to limit exposure. Additionally, enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA) for WordPress admin accounts can reduce the likelihood of successful exploitation. Regularly auditing plugin configurations and monitoring for unexpected changes can help detect exploitation attempts early. Developers should review and enforce nonce validation on all state-changing plugin actions to prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-08-28T20:02:32.658Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68c27a23e1c560fa9d94d4cc

Added to database: 9/11/2025, 7:28:35 AM

Last enriched: 2/26/2026, 6:08:26 PM

Last updated: 3/24/2026, 12:29:53 AM

Views: 50

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses