CVE-2025-9897: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in hovanesvn AP Background
The AP Background plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the advParallaxBackAdminSaveSlider function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create or modify background sliders via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-9897 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting the AP Background plugin for WordPress, developed by hovanesvn. This vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 3.8.2 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the advParallaxBackAdminSaveSlider function. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests to perform sensitive actions originate from legitimate users and not from forged requests. The absence or improper implementation of nonce validation allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft malicious requests that, when executed by an authenticated site administrator (e.g., by clicking a malicious link), can create or modify background sliders on the WordPress site. Although this vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, it impacts the integrity of the website's content by allowing unauthorized modifications. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.3 (medium severity), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based, requires no privileges, but does require user interaction (the administrator must be tricked into performing the action). No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet, indicating that mitigation may rely on plugin updates or manual hardening. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-352, a common web application security issue related to CSRF attacks, which are prevalent in web plugins and applications that fail to implement proper request validation mechanisms.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using WordPress sites with the AP Background plugin, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk to website integrity. Attackers can manipulate visual elements (background sliders) without authentication, potentially defacing websites or injecting misleading content. While this does not directly lead to data breaches or service outages, it can damage brand reputation, reduce user trust, and be leveraged as part of broader social engineering or phishing campaigns. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on web presence—such as e-commerce, media, government, and education—may find this particularly impactful. Additionally, compromised visual content could be used to mislead visitors or redirect them to malicious sites, indirectly increasing risk. The requirement for administrator interaction limits the attack scope but does not eliminate risk, especially if administrators are targeted via phishing or social engineering. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe, the vulnerability could affect a significant number of sites if not addressed promptly.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves educating WordPress site administrators about the risk of clicking on untrusted links or performing actions prompted by suspicious communications. 2. Administrators should verify the authenticity of requests before interacting with plugin interfaces. 3. Site owners should monitor for updates from the plugin developer and apply patches as soon as they become available. 4. In the absence of an official patch, site administrators can implement manual nonce validation by modifying the plugin code to include proper WordPress nonce checks in the advParallaxBackAdminSaveSlider function. 5. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting WordPress admin endpoints. 6. Limit administrative access to trusted networks or VPNs to reduce exposure. 7. Regularly audit installed plugins for vulnerabilities and remove or replace those that are unmaintained or insecure. 8. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce the risk of content injection and manipulation. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on immediate behavioral changes, code-level fixes, and network-level protections tailored to this specific vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, Belgium, Austria
CVE-2025-9897: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in hovanesvn AP Background
Description
The AP Background plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the advParallaxBackAdminSaveSlider function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create or modify background sliders via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-9897 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting the AP Background plugin for WordPress, developed by hovanesvn. This vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 3.8.2 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the advParallaxBackAdminSaveSlider function. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests to perform sensitive actions originate from legitimate users and not from forged requests. The absence or improper implementation of nonce validation allows an unauthenticated attacker to craft malicious requests that, when executed by an authenticated site administrator (e.g., by clicking a malicious link), can create or modify background sliders on the WordPress site. Although this vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, it impacts the integrity of the website's content by allowing unauthorized modifications. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.3 (medium severity), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based, requires no privileges, but does require user interaction (the administrator must be tricked into performing the action). No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet, indicating that mitigation may rely on plugin updates or manual hardening. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-352, a common web application security issue related to CSRF attacks, which are prevalent in web plugins and applications that fail to implement proper request validation mechanisms.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using WordPress sites with the AP Background plugin, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk to website integrity. Attackers can manipulate visual elements (background sliders) without authentication, potentially defacing websites or injecting misleading content. While this does not directly lead to data breaches or service outages, it can damage brand reputation, reduce user trust, and be leveraged as part of broader social engineering or phishing campaigns. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on web presence—such as e-commerce, media, government, and education—may find this particularly impactful. Additionally, compromised visual content could be used to mislead visitors or redirect them to malicious sites, indirectly increasing risk. The requirement for administrator interaction limits the attack scope but does not eliminate risk, especially if administrators are targeted via phishing or social engineering. Given the widespread use of WordPress in Europe, the vulnerability could affect a significant number of sites if not addressed promptly.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves educating WordPress site administrators about the risk of clicking on untrusted links or performing actions prompted by suspicious communications. 2. Administrators should verify the authenticity of requests before interacting with plugin interfaces. 3. Site owners should monitor for updates from the plugin developer and apply patches as soon as they become available. 4. In the absence of an official patch, site administrators can implement manual nonce validation by modifying the plugin code to include proper WordPress nonce checks in the advParallaxBackAdminSaveSlider function. 5. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting WordPress admin endpoints. 6. Limit administrative access to trusted networks or VPNs to reduce exposure. 7. Regularly audit installed plugins for vulnerabilities and remove or replace those that are unmaintained or insecure. 8. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce the risk of content injection and manipulation. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on immediate behavioral changes, code-level fixes, and network-level protections tailored to this specific vulnerability.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-09-02T23:29:24.475Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68dfb277c3835a5fbe033cbb
Added to database: 10/3/2025, 11:24:39 AM
Last enriched: 10/3/2025, 11:28:32 AM
Last updated: 10/6/2025, 9:44:07 AM
Views: 13
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-11330: SQL Injection in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System
MediumCVE-2025-0609: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Logo Software Inc. Logo Cloud
MediumCVE-2025-0608: CWE-601 URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') in Logo Software Inc. Logo Cloud
MediumCVE-2025-0607: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Logo Software Inc. Logo Cloud
MediumCVE-2025-11329: SQL Injection in code-projects Online Course Registration
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.