CVE-2026-0603VulnerabilityPublished 23 Jan 2026Updated 6 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-0603: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 · SQL Injection

Affects Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.3 High · fixed in 7.4.24 : patch Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.3High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 1.0% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 63% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 7.4.24

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.24	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 8	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 8	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 9	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 9	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7.6.13	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRHEL-8 based Middleware Containers	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat AMQ Broker 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat build of OptaPlanner 8	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Data Grid 8	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Fuse 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Process Automation 7	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6	Affected–	Fixed in–
GitHuborg.hibernate/hibernate-core`pkg:github/org.hibernate/hibernate-core`Other threats	Affected >=5.2.8 <=5.6.15	Fixed in–
Mavenorg.hibernate/hibernate-core`pkg:maven/org.hibernate/hibernate-core`Other threats	Affected =5.2.8	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Red Hat has provided an official security update fixing this vulnerability in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.24 for RHEL 7 and RHEL 8. Users should apply this update after ensuring all prior relevant errata are applied and backing up their systems. The vendor advisory is the authoritative source for remediation guidance. Patch status is confirmed as fixed in version 7.4.24 of the JBoss Enterprise Application Platform.

Description

A flaw was found in Hibernate. A remote attacker with low privileges could exploit a second-order SQL injection vulnerability by providing specially crafted, unsanitized non-alphanumeric characters in the ID column when the InlineIdsOrClauseBuilder is used. This could lead to sensitive information disclosure, such as reading system files, and allow for data manipulation or deletion within the application's database, resulting in an application level denial of service.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows an attacker with low privileges to disclose sensitive information, manipulate or delete data in the database, and cause application-level denial of service. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 8.3 (High), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and high impact on confidentiality and integrity with low impact on availability.

CWE-89Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #2OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Parameterization
If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Architecture and Design · Operation · Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Query Parameterization (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
XML External Entity Prevention (opens in a new tab)
File Upload (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.3.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Command Line Execution through SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
Object Relational Mapping Injection (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering (opens in a new tab)
Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Jul 2026, 00:04 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-89

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats