Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-0848: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in nltk nltk/nltk

0
Critical
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-0848cvecve-2026-0848cwe-20
Published: Thu Mar 05 2026 (03/05/2026, 20:48:05 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: nltk
Product: nltk/nltk

Description

NLTK versions <=3.9.2 are vulnerable to arbitrary code execution due to improper input validation in the StanfordSegmenter module. The module dynamically loads external Java .jar files without verification or sandboxing. An attacker can supply or replace the JAR file, enabling the execution of arbitrary Java bytecode at import time. This vulnerability can be exploited through methods such as model poisoning, MITM attacks, or dependency poisoning, leading to remote code execution. The issue arises from the direct execution of the JAR file via subprocess with unvalidated classpath input, allowing malicious classes to execute when loaded by the JVM.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 03/05/2026, 21:15:41 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-0848 is a critical security vulnerability affecting the Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) library, versions up to 3.9.2, specifically within the StanfordSegmenter module. This module relies on dynamically loading external Java .jar files to perform segmentation tasks. The core issue stems from improper input validation (CWE-20), where the module accepts and executes Java .jar files without verifying their authenticity or sandboxing their execution environment. The vulnerability allows an attacker to supply or replace the JAR file used by the module, enabling arbitrary Java bytecode execution when the JAR is loaded by the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) during import. The execution occurs via a subprocess call that uses an unvalidated classpath input, making it possible to execute malicious code remotely. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability through several vectors, including model poisoning (injecting malicious models), man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks intercepting and modifying JAR files in transit, or dependency poisoning by compromising repositories or package sources. The vulnerability affects all systems using the vulnerable NLTK versions that utilize the StanfordSegmenter, potentially impacting any application relying on this NLP functionality. The CVSS v3.0 base score is 10.0, reflecting the vulnerability's critical nature with network attack vector, no required privileges or user interaction, and complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Despite the severity, no patches have been released yet, and no public exploits have been observed. This vulnerability highlights the risks of executing untrusted code in machine learning and NLP pipelines without proper validation and sandboxing.

Potential Impact

The impact of CVE-2026-0848 is severe and far-reaching for organizations worldwide that use NLTK for natural language processing tasks, especially those utilizing the StanfordSegmenter module. Successful exploitation leads to remote code execution (RCE) with the same privileges as the application running NLTK, potentially allowing attackers to take full control of affected systems. This can result in data breaches, unauthorized access to sensitive information, disruption of services, and lateral movement within networks. The vulnerability compromises confidentiality, integrity, and availability simultaneously, making it a critical risk for enterprises, research institutions, and cloud services relying on NLP pipelines. Attackers exploiting this flaw could implant persistent backdoors, exfiltrate data, or disrupt automated processes. Given the widespread use of NLTK in academia, industry, and cloud-based AI services, the threat surface is extensive. Additionally, the ease of exploitation without authentication or user interaction increases the likelihood of attacks, especially in environments where external JAR files are fetched dynamically or from untrusted sources. The lack of patches further exacerbates the risk, leaving organizations exposed until mitigations or updates are applied.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2026-0848 effectively, organizations should take immediate and specific actions beyond generic advice: 1) Avoid using the StanfordSegmenter module in NLTK versions ≤3.9.2 until a patched version is released. 2) Implement strict controls on the source and integrity of Java .jar files used by NLP pipelines, including cryptographic verification (e.g., signatures or hashes) before loading. 3) Employ network-level protections such as TLS with certificate pinning to prevent MITM attacks on JAR file downloads. 4) Use application sandboxing or containerization to isolate the execution environment of NLP components, limiting the impact of potential code execution. 5) Monitor and audit file system and subprocess calls related to Java JAR loading to detect anomalous or unauthorized modifications. 6) Review and harden dependency management practices to prevent dependency poisoning, including locking dependencies to known good versions and using trusted repositories. 7) Consider alternative NLP tools or segmentation modules that do not rely on dynamic loading of external code until this vulnerability is resolved. 8) Stay informed about updates from the NLTK project and apply patches promptly once available. 9) Conduct threat modeling and penetration testing focused on the NLP pipeline to identify and remediate similar risks. These targeted mitigations reduce the attack surface and help contain potential exploitation.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
@huntr_ai
Date Reserved
2026-01-10T23:59:44.115Z
Cvss Version
3.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69a9ef11c48b3f10ff4d0658

Added to database: 3/5/2026, 9:01:05 PM

Last enriched: 3/5/2026, 9:15:41 PM

Last updated: 4/19/2026, 10:17:18 AM

Views: 137

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses