VulnerabilityPublished 26 Sep 2026Updated 28 Sep 2026

CVE-2026-100668: getgrav grav · Information Exposure

Affects getgrav gravSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.1 High : upgrade to 2.0.25 soon.

Data as of 8 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

7.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.0.25

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 9 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

ghsa-g565-6qmq-w49v

What to do

Upgrade grav and getgrav/grav to 2.0.25.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
getgravgrav	Affected <2.0.25	Fixed in 2.0.25
GitHubgetgrav/grav`pkg:github/getgrav/grav`Other threats	Affected <2.0.25	Fixed in 2.0.25

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Upgrade Grav to version 2.0.25 or later, where this vulnerability is fixed. No other mitigation or temporary workaround is indicated. Since this is not a cloud service, remediation depends on applying the official fix.

Description

Grav 2.0.0 through 2.0.24 contain a Twig content sandbox escape. The `array` filter (and its identical function form) is on the sandbox allowlist but is registered without the needs_is_sandboxed guard that print_r, vardump, json_encode, yaml_encode and string carry, and its implementation calls toArray() — or falls back to an (array) cast — without consulting the sandbox method allowlist. Because the `grav` Twig global is the raw Pimple-based dependency injection container, a user who can author Twig in page content can evaluate `grav|array` to read the container's private $values array, including the un-redacted Config service; a second array cast returns the entire configuration tree, disclosing plugin credentials, SMTP and OAuth secrets, Redis passwords, proxy URLs and the security.* subtree that the sandbox's redaction is meant to hide. Because the payload is stored in page content, the disclosed configuration is rendered to anonymous visitors. Grav 1.7 is not affected as it has no Twig content sandbox. Fixed in Grav 2.0.25.

Impact

An attacker with the ability to author Twig in page content can bypass sandbox restrictions to read sensitive configuration data including credentials and secrets. This exposure can lead to compromise of system components relying on these secrets. The vulnerability affects Grav 2.0.0 through 2.0.24. Grav 1.7 is not affected. The vulnerability has a CVSS 4.0 score of 7.1 (high severity). There are no known exploits in the wild.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Oct 2026, 16:57 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats