CVE-2026-1159VulnerabilityPublished 19 Jan 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-1159: itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System · SQL Injection

Affects itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 33% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 19 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecodeOnline Frozen Foods Ordering System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:itsourcecode:online_frozen_foods_ordering_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-1159, organizations should immediately implement the following specific measures: 1) Apply vendor patches or updates as soon as they become available. 2) If patches are unavailable, modify the /order_online.php code to use parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions involving user input, especially the product_name parameter. 3) Implement strict input validation and sanitization to reject or escape malicious input patterns. 4) Restrict database user permissions to the minimum necessary, preventing unauthorized data modification or access. 5) Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting SQL injection patterns to provide an additional layer of defense. 6) Conduct regular security code reviews and penetration testing focused on injection flaws. 7) Monitor logs for unusual database queries or error messages indicative of injection attempts. 8) Educate developers on secure coding practices to prevent similar vulnerabilities in future releases. 9) Consider isolating the ordering system database from other critical systems to limit lateral movement in case of compromise. 10) Maintain an incident response plan to quickly address any detected exploitation attempts.

Description

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /order_online.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument product_name can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability in the Online Frozen Foods Ordering System can have significant impacts on organizations worldwide. Exploitation can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive customer and business data, including order details and potentially payment information, compromising confidentiality. Attackers may alter or delete data, affecting data integrity and disrupting business operations. The availability of the ordering system could be impacted if attackers execute destructive queries or cause database corruption, leading to downtime and loss of revenue. For e-commerce businesses, such breaches can damage customer trust and result in regulatory penalties, especially in regions with strict data protection laws. The remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit increases the risk of widespread attacks, particularly if the software is deployed in multiple organizations without proper security controls. The public availability of an exploit further elevates the threat, potentially attracting opportunistic attackers and increasing the likelihood of automated scanning and exploitation attempts.

Summary

CVE-2026-1159 identifies a SQL injection vulnerability in the itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System version 1.0. The vulnerability resides in the /order_online.php script, where the product_name parameter is improperly sanitized, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL code. This injection can be exploited remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction, making it highly accessible to attackers. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access to the backend database, enabling attackers to read, modify, or delete sensitive data such as customer orders, product information, or user credentials. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and partial impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (VC:L, VI:L, VA:L). Although no active exploitation has been reported, the public availability of an exploit increases the likelihood of attacks. The absence of patches or vendor-provided fixes at the time of publication necessitates immediate defensive measures. This vulnerability highlights the critical need for secure coding practices, particularly input validation and the use of prepared statements or parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection. Organizations relying on this software should conduct thorough code reviews and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate similar issues.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…