VulnerabilityPublished 18 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-1296: Frontend Post Submission Manager Lite (WordPress plugin) · Open Redirect

Affects Frontend Post Submission Manager Lite (WordPress plugin)Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · public detection template (Nuclei) · CVSS 6.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 43% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Feb 2026
Detectable: evidence found.
nuclei template: Frontend Post Submission Manager Lite <= 1.2.7 - Open Redirect
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
wpshuffleFrontend Post Submission Manager Lite – Frontend Posting WordPress Plugin	Affected >=1.0.0 <=1.2.7	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately identify if they are using the Frontend Post Submission Manager Lite plugin, particularly versions up to 1.2.7. Since no official patches are currently linked, temporary mitigations include disabling or removing the plugin if feasible. Alternatively, implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block requests containing suspicious or external URLs in the 'requested_page' POST parameter. Custom input validation can be added to restrict redirection targets to trusted internal URLs only. Educate users and administrators about the risks of clicking suspicious links, especially those that appear to redirect through the affected site. Monitor web server logs for unusual redirect patterns or spikes in POST requests to the vulnerable endpoint. Keep abreast of vendor updates or patches and apply them promptly once available. For long-term security, consider replacing the plugin with alternatives that follow secure coding practices and validate redirect parameters properly. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on open redirect and input validation vulnerabilities.

Description

The Frontend Post Submission Manager Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Open Redirection in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.7 due to insufficient validation on the 'requested_page' POST parameter in the verify_username_password function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to redirect users to potentially malicious sites if they can successfully trick them into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the increased risk of phishing and social engineering attacks targeting their users or customers. Attackers can leverage the open redirect to craft URLs that appear legitimate but redirect victims to malicious sites, potentially leading to credential theft, malware infection, or fraud. This can damage organizational reputation, lead to data breaches if credentials are compromised, and cause financial losses. Since the vulnerability does not affect system availability or directly compromise backend systems, the impact is mostly on confidentiality and user trust. Organizations running WordPress sites with this plugin, especially those handling sensitive user data or financial transactions, face higher risks. The medium CVSS score indicates a moderate threat level, but the ease of exploitation and lack of required privileges make it a notable concern. Additionally, the vulnerability could be chained with other attacks to escalate impact. The absence of known exploits suggests a window for proactive mitigation before widespread abuse occurs.

CWE-601URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: LowOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design
Use an intermediate disclaimer page that provides the user with a clear warning that they are leaving the current site. Implement a long timeout before the redirect occurs, or force the user to click on the link. Be careful to avoid XSS problems (CWE-79) when generating the disclaimer page.
Architecture and Design · Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.1.5 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Cross-Site Flashing (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 18 Feb 2026, 05:15 UTC

Public exploits and detectiona Nuclei detection template

WeaknessesCWE-601

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats