CVE-2026-1518: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Red Hat Red Hat Build of Keycloak
A flaw was found in Keycloak’s CIBA feature where insufficient validation of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints could allow blind server-side requests to internal services.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-1518 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Client Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) feature of the Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The flaw stems from insufficient validation of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints, which are URLs that Keycloak contacts to notify clients about authentication events. Because these endpoints are not properly validated, an attacker with high privileges (such as a registered client with configuration rights) can configure a malicious endpoint that causes Keycloak to send blind HTTP requests to internal or otherwise protected network resources. This could allow attackers to probe internal services, potentially leading to information disclosure or further exploitation. The vulnerability requires high privileges to exploit, does not require user interaction, and does not impact confidentiality or availability directly but can affect integrity by manipulating internal communications. The CVSS score of 2.7 reflects these factors, indicating low severity. No known exploits have been reported, and no official patches or workarounds have been detailed yet. The vulnerability highlights the importance of validating client-configured URLs and restricting server-side request capabilities to prevent SSRF attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2026-1518 is generally low but context-dependent. Organizations using Red Hat Build of Keycloak with the CIBA feature enabled and allowing clients to configure backchannel notification endpoints are at risk. An attacker with sufficient privileges could leverage this vulnerability to perform SSRF attacks, potentially accessing internal network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally. This could lead to reconnaissance of internal services, exposure of sensitive metadata, or pivoting to more critical systems. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, it can undermine the integrity of internal communications and increase the attack surface. In highly regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, or government within Europe, even low-severity SSRF vulnerabilities warrant prompt attention due to strict compliance requirements and the sensitivity of internal networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Enforce strict validation and whitelisting of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints to ensure only trusted URLs are accepted. 2) Limit the network access of the Keycloak server, especially outbound HTTP requests, to prevent unauthorized internal resource access. 3) Monitor Keycloak logs and network traffic for unusual or unexpected outbound requests that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4) Apply the latest Red Hat security advisories and patches as they become available, even though no explicit patch links are currently provided. 5) Restrict client privileges to the minimum necessary, avoiding granting configuration rights to untrusted clients. 6) Consider disabling the CIBA feature if not required or deploying it in isolated environments. 7) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on SSRF vectors within authentication infrastructure.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
CVE-2026-1518: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Red Hat Red Hat Build of Keycloak
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak’s CIBA feature where insufficient validation of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints could allow blind server-side requests to internal services.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-1518 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Client Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA) feature of the Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The flaw stems from insufficient validation of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints, which are URLs that Keycloak contacts to notify clients about authentication events. Because these endpoints are not properly validated, an attacker with high privileges (such as a registered client with configuration rights) can configure a malicious endpoint that causes Keycloak to send blind HTTP requests to internal or otherwise protected network resources. This could allow attackers to probe internal services, potentially leading to information disclosure or further exploitation. The vulnerability requires high privileges to exploit, does not require user interaction, and does not impact confidentiality or availability directly but can affect integrity by manipulating internal communications. The CVSS score of 2.7 reflects these factors, indicating low severity. No known exploits have been reported, and no official patches or workarounds have been detailed yet. The vulnerability highlights the importance of validating client-configured URLs and restricting server-side request capabilities to prevent SSRF attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2026-1518 is generally low but context-dependent. Organizations using Red Hat Build of Keycloak with the CIBA feature enabled and allowing clients to configure backchannel notification endpoints are at risk. An attacker with sufficient privileges could leverage this vulnerability to perform SSRF attacks, potentially accessing internal network resources that are otherwise inaccessible externally. This could lead to reconnaissance of internal services, exposure of sensitive metadata, or pivoting to more critical systems. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, it can undermine the integrity of internal communications and increase the attack surface. In highly regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, or government within Europe, even low-severity SSRF vulnerabilities warrant prompt attention due to strict compliance requirements and the sensitivity of internal networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Enforce strict validation and whitelisting of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints to ensure only trusted URLs are accepted. 2) Limit the network access of the Keycloak server, especially outbound HTTP requests, to prevent unauthorized internal resource access. 3) Monitor Keycloak logs and network traffic for unusual or unexpected outbound requests that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4) Apply the latest Red Hat security advisories and patches as they become available, even though no explicit patch links are currently provided. 5) Restrict client privileges to the minimum necessary, avoiding granting configuration rights to untrusted clients. 6) Consider disabling the CIBA feature if not required or deploying it in isolated environments. 7) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on SSRF vectors within authentication infrastructure.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-28T08:08:15.419Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69805578ac06320222d0c0d6
Added to database: 2/2/2026, 7:42:48 AM
Last enriched: 2/2/2026, 8:06:34 AM
Last updated: 2/6/2026, 11:20:03 PM
Views: 23
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-25762: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25754: CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25644: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in datahub-project datahub
HighCVE-2026-25804: CWE-287: Improper Authentication in antrea-io antrea
HighCVE-2026-25803: CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials in denpiligrim 3dp-manager
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.