CVE-2026-1597VulnerabilityPublished 29 Jan 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-1597: Bdtask SalesERP · Improper Authorization

Affects Bdtask SalesERPSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
BdtaskSalesERP	Affected =20260116	Fixed in–
GitHubbdtask/saleserp`pkg:github/bdtask/saleserp`Other threats	Affected =20260116	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:bdtask:saleserp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Implement strict network-level access controls to restrict access to the administrative endpoint only to trusted IP addresses or VPN users. 2. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious manipulation of session parameters, particularly the ci_session argument. 3. Conduct thorough logging and monitoring of administrative endpoint access to detect anomalous or unauthorized attempts promptly. 4. Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) on all administrative accounts to add an additional layer of security, even if authorization bypass is attempted. 5. Isolate the SalesERP administrative interface on a separate network segment to limit exposure. 6. Regularly audit user privileges and session management mechanisms to identify and remediate potential weaknesses. 7. Engage with the vendor or community to obtain updates or patches as soon as they become available. 8. Consider temporary compensating controls such as disabling remote administrative access if feasible until a patch is released. 9. Educate IT and security teams about this specific vulnerability to ensure rapid incident response if exploitation attempts are detected.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask SalesERP up to 20260116. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Administrative Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument ci_session leads to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

The vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authorization mechanisms in the administrative endpoint of Bdtask SalesERP, potentially gaining unauthorized administrative privileges. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive business data, manipulation of ERP configurations, and disruption of business processes. The impact on confidentiality includes exposure of sensitive data; integrity impact involves unauthorized modification of data or system settings; availability impact could arise from malicious changes causing system outages. Since the vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction, exploitation is relatively easy, increasing risk. Organizations relying on SalesERP for critical business functions may face operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage. The absence of a vendor patch prolongs exposure, increasing the window for potential attacks. However, the limited scope of the vulnerability to a specific component and the lack of known exploits in the wild somewhat mitigate immediate widespread impact.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…