CVE-2026-1714VulnerabilityPublished 18 Feb 2026Updated 8 Apr 2026

CVE-2026-1714: ShopLentor (WordPress plugin) · CRLF Injection

Affects ShopLentor (WordPress plugin)Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.6 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.6High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 54% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
devitemsllcShopLentor – All-in-One WooCommerce Growth & Store Enhancement Plugin	Affected <=3.3.2	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Until a fix is available, consider disabling or restricting access to the vulnerable AJAX endpoint if possible, or applying web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block CRLF injection attempts targeting the affected parameters.

Description

The ShopLentor – WooCommerce Builder for Elementor & Gutenberg +21 Modules – All in One Solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Email Relay Abuse in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2. This is due to the lack of validation on the 'send_to', 'product_title', 'wlmessage', and 'wlemail' parameters in the 'woolentor_suggest_price_action' AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send arbitrary emails to any recipient with full control over the subject line, message content, and sender address (via CRLF injection in the 'wlemail' parameter), effectively turning the website into a full email relay for spam or phishing campaigns.

Impact

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to send arbitrary emails from the affected website, controlling the recipient, subject, message content, and sender address. This can be leveraged to conduct spam or phishing campaigns using the compromised site as an email relay. The integrity of email communications is compromised, but there is no direct impact on confidentiality or availability of the system. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild.

Summary

The ShopLentor – All-in-One WooCommerce Growth & Store Enhancement Plugin for WordPress suffers from a CRLF injection vulnerability (CWE-93) in the 'woolentor_suggest_price_action' AJAX endpoint. The plugin fails to validate the 'send_to', 'product_title', 'wlmessage', and 'wlemail' parameters, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject carriage return and line feed characters into the 'wlemail' parameter. This enables attackers to manipulate email headers and send arbitrary emails through the website, effectively turning it into an open email relay. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 3.3.2. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 8.6, indicating high severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and a scope change. The impact is high on integrity but does not affect confidentiality or availability.

CWE-93Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs.
Implementation
Avoid using CRLF as a special sequence.
Implementation
Appropriately filter or quote CRLF sequences in user-controlled input.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention in Java (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Command Delimiters (opens in a new tab)
Web Server Logs Tampering (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 9 Apr 2026, 11:22 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-93

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats