Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-1760: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-1760cvecve-2026-1760
Published: Mon Feb 02 2026 (02/02/2026, 14:01:26 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Red Hat
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Description

A flaw was found in SoupServer. This HTTP request smuggling vulnerability occurs because SoupServer improperly handles requests that combine Transfer-Encoding: chunked and Connection: keep-alive headers. A remote, unauthenticated client can exploit this by sending specially crafted requests, causing SoupServer to fail to close the connection as required by RFC 9112. This allows the attacker to smuggle additional requests over the persistent connection, leading to unintended request processing and potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 02/27/2026, 09:20:01 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-1760 is a medium-severity HTTP request smuggling vulnerability affecting SoupServer, a component used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10. The flaw stems from inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests that include both Transfer-Encoding: chunked and Connection: keep-alive headers. According to RFC 9112, servers must close connections in certain scenarios to prevent request smuggling. However, SoupServer fails to close the connection properly when these headers are combined, allowing an attacker to send specially crafted HTTP requests that are 'smuggled' through the persistent connection. This means the attacker can inject additional HTTP requests that the server processes unintentionally, potentially bypassing security controls or causing resource exhaustion. The vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely over the network. While it does not directly compromise confidentiality or integrity, the unintended request processing can lead to denial-of-service conditions by exhausting server resources or disrupting normal traffic handling. No public exploits have been observed so far, but the nature of HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities makes them a significant concern for web-facing services. The issue highlights the importance of strict adherence to HTTP protocol specifications and robust connection management in HTTP servers.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-1760 is on the availability of affected systems. By exploiting this vulnerability, attackers can cause denial-of-service conditions through resource exhaustion or by disrupting normal HTTP request processing. Although confidentiality and integrity are not directly affected, the ability to smuggle requests can potentially be leveraged in complex attack chains to bypass security controls or inject malicious requests. Organizations relying on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 with SoupServer in web-facing roles may experience service disruptions, degraded performance, or increased risk of further exploitation if this vulnerability is chained with others. The vulnerability's remote, unauthenticated nature increases its risk profile, as attackers do not need credentials or user interaction to exploit it. This can lead to widespread scanning and exploitation attempts once public exploits emerge, impacting service availability and reliability for enterprises, cloud providers, and hosting environments worldwide.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2026-1760, organizations should apply any available patches or updates from Red Hat promptly once released. In the absence of patches, administrators can implement strict HTTP request validation and filtering at perimeter devices such as web application firewalls (WAFs) or reverse proxies to detect and block suspicious combinations of Transfer-Encoding and Connection headers. Monitoring HTTP traffic for anomalous persistent connections or unusual request patterns can help identify exploitation attempts early. Disabling or restricting the use of chunked transfer encoding where feasible may reduce exposure. Network segmentation and limiting exposure of vulnerable SoupServer instances to untrusted networks can also reduce risk. Additionally, organizations should review and harden their HTTP server configurations to ensure compliance with RFC 9112 connection handling requirements. Regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on HTTP request smuggling techniques can help validate the effectiveness of mitigations.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
redhat
Date Reserved
2026-02-02T12:25:23.985Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6980b180f9fa50a62f4545f5

Added to database: 2/2/2026, 2:15:28 PM

Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 9:20:01 AM

Last updated: 3/19/2026, 8:26:59 PM

Views: 91

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses