VulnerabilityPublished 23 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-1958: BRI KlinikaXP Insertino · Use of Hard-coded Credentials

Affects BRI KlinikaXP InsertinoSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High : upgrade to 3.1.0.1 soon.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 17% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 3.1.0.1, 5.39.01.01

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade KlinikaXP Insertino to 3.1.0.1; KlinikaXP to 5.39.01.01.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
BRIKlinikaXP Insertino	Affected <3.1.0.1	Fixed in 3.1.0.1
BRIKlinikaXP	Affected <5.39.01.01	Fixed in 5.39.01.01

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-1958, organizations should immediately update KlinikaXP to version 5.39.01.01 or later and KlinikaXP Insertino to version 3.1.0.1 or later, where the hard-coded credentials have been removed and credentials rotated. Additionally, organizations should audit their update infrastructure to verify the integrity and authenticity of update packages, employing cryptographic signing and verification mechanisms if not already in place. Network segmentation should be enforced to restrict access to internal services and FTP servers hosting update packages, limiting exposure to unauthorized actors. Monitoring and logging access to update servers should be enhanced to detect anomalous activities indicative of compromise. Organizations should also conduct a thorough review of credential management practices to eliminate hard-coded credentials in all software components and implement secure secret management solutions. Finally, incident response plans should be updated to address potential supply chain compromise scenarios.

Description

Use of hard-coded credentials in Klinika XP and KlinikaXP Insertino allowed an unauthorized attacker access to several internal services. Critically, this included access to the FTP server that hosted the application's update packages. The attacker with these credentials could upload a malicious update file, which then may have been distributed and installed on client machines as a legitimate update. This issue affects KlinikaXP: before 5.39.01.01.and KlinikaXP Insertino before 3.1.0.1 Beside removing the hardcoded credentials from the code, previously exposed credentials were also rotated preventing further attack attempts.

Impact

The impact of CVE-2026-1958 is significant for organizations using KlinikaXP and KlinikaXP Insertino software. Unauthorized access to internal services via hard-coded credentials can lead to a complete compromise of the update infrastructure. Attackers could distribute malicious updates that appear legitimate, potentially infecting all client machines that receive these updates. This scenario can result in widespread malware deployment, data breaches, and loss of trust in the software supply chain. Confidentiality is severely impacted as attackers gain access to internal services and potentially sensitive data. Although integrity and availability are not directly affected per the CVSS vector, the ability to push malicious updates indirectly threatens these properties by enabling further malicious actions on client systems. The ease of exploitation (no authentication or user interaction required) and network accessibility increase the risk of rapid and broad exploitation. Organizations relying on these products, especially in healthcare or other critical sectors, face elevated risks of operational disruption and data compromise.

CWE-798Use of Hard-coded Credentials (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key.
Architecture and Design
For outbound authentication: store passwords, keys, and other credentials outside of the code in a strongly-protected, encrypted configuration file or database that is protected from access by all outsiders, including other local users on the same system. Properly protect the key (CWE-320).
Architecture and Design
For inbound authentication: Rather than hard-code a default username and password, key, or other authentication credentials for first time logins, utilize a "first login" mode that requires the user to enter a unique strong password or key.
Architecture and Design
If the product must contain hard-coded credentials or they cannot be removed, perform access control checks and limit which entities can access the feature that requires the hard-coded credentials. For example, a feature might only be enabled through the system console instead of through a network connection.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Key Management (opens in a new tab)
REST Security (opens in a new tab)
JSON Web Token for Java (opens in a new tab)
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.10.4 (opens in a new tab)
V6.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
V3.5.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Read Sensitive Constants Within an Executable (opens in a new tab)
Try Common or Default Usernames and Passwords (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Mar 2026, 13:15 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-798

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats