CVE-2026-1983: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in sourcez SEATT: Simple Event Attendance
The SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the event deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary events via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-1983 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 1.5.0. The vulnerability stems from the absence of nonce validation on the event deletion functionality, which is a security mechanism designed to ensure that requests are intentional and originate from legitimate users. Without this protection, an attacker can craft a malicious request that, if executed by an administrator (e.g., by clicking a link or visiting a malicious webpage), will delete arbitrary events from the system. This attack does not require the attacker to be authenticated or have any privileges; the critical factor is the ability to trick an administrator into performing the action. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of event data but does not affect confidentiality or availability. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.3, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, but requiring user interaction. No patches or official fixes are currently linked, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-352, which covers CSRF issues. This type of vulnerability is common in web applications that fail to implement proper anti-CSRF tokens or nonce validation on sensitive state-changing operations.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability primarily threatens the integrity of event-related data managed through the SEATT plugin. Unauthorized deletion of events could disrupt business operations, event planning, and attendance tracking, potentially causing reputational damage and operational inefficiencies. Organizations relying heavily on event management for customer engagement, internal coordination, or compliance reporting may face increased risks. Although the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or availability, the loss or manipulation of event data could lead to misinformation, scheduling conflicts, or loss of critical event history. In sectors such as education, government, and large enterprises where event attendance records are important, this could have downstream effects on decision-making and audit trails. The requirement for administrator interaction means that social engineering or phishing campaigns could be used to exploit this vulnerability, increasing the risk in environments with less security awareness or training.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately update the SEATT plugin to a version that includes nonce validation on the event deletion functionality once available. In the absence of an official patch, administrators can implement custom nonce checks in the plugin code to validate requests before processing event deletions. Additionally, organizations should educate administrators about the risks of clicking untrusted links and implement security awareness training focused on phishing and social engineering. Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns can provide an additional layer of defense. Restricting administrative access to trusted networks or VPNs and enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for WordPress admin accounts can reduce the likelihood of successful exploitation. Regular backups of event data should be maintained to enable recovery in case of unauthorized deletions. Monitoring logs for unusual deletion requests or patterns can help detect attempted exploitation early.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-2026-1983: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in sourcez SEATT: Simple Event Attendance
Description
The SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the event deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary events via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-1983 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress, affecting all versions up to and including 1.5.0. The vulnerability stems from the absence of nonce validation on the event deletion functionality, which is a security mechanism designed to ensure that requests are intentional and originate from legitimate users. Without this protection, an attacker can craft a malicious request that, if executed by an administrator (e.g., by clicking a link or visiting a malicious webpage), will delete arbitrary events from the system. This attack does not require the attacker to be authenticated or have any privileges; the critical factor is the ability to trick an administrator into performing the action. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of event data but does not affect confidentiality or availability. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.3, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, but requiring user interaction. No patches or official fixes are currently linked, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. The vulnerability is categorized under CWE-352, which covers CSRF issues. This type of vulnerability is common in web applications that fail to implement proper anti-CSRF tokens or nonce validation on sensitive state-changing operations.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability primarily threatens the integrity of event-related data managed through the SEATT plugin. Unauthorized deletion of events could disrupt business operations, event planning, and attendance tracking, potentially causing reputational damage and operational inefficiencies. Organizations relying heavily on event management for customer engagement, internal coordination, or compliance reporting may face increased risks. Although the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or availability, the loss or manipulation of event data could lead to misinformation, scheduling conflicts, or loss of critical event history. In sectors such as education, government, and large enterprises where event attendance records are important, this could have downstream effects on decision-making and audit trails. The requirement for administrator interaction means that social engineering or phishing campaigns could be used to exploit this vulnerability, increasing the risk in environments with less security awareness or training.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately update the SEATT plugin to a version that includes nonce validation on the event deletion functionality once available. In the absence of an official patch, administrators can implement custom nonce checks in the plugin code to validate requests before processing event deletions. Additionally, organizations should educate administrators about the risks of clicking untrusted links and implement security awareness training focused on phishing and social engineering. Employing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block CSRF attack patterns can provide an additional layer of defense. Restricting administrative access to trusted networks or VPNs and enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for WordPress admin accounts can reduce the likelihood of successful exploitation. Regular backups of event data should be maintained to enable recovery in case of unauthorized deletions. Monitoring logs for unusual deletion requests or patterns can help detect attempted exploitation early.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2026-02-05T14:45:19.212Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 698ffec8c9e1ff5ad85c7206
Added to database: 2/14/2026, 4:49:12 AM
Last enriched: 2/14/2026, 5:04:05 AM
Last updated: 2/21/2026, 12:18:03 AM
Views: 56
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-27203: CWE-15: External Control of System or Configuration Setting in YosefHayim ebay-mcp
HighCVE-2026-27168: CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in HappySeaFox sail
HighCVE-2026-27134: CWE-287: Improper Authentication in strimzi strimzi-kafka-operator
HighCVE-2026-27190: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in denoland deno
HighCVE-2026-27026: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in py-pdf pypdf
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.