CVE-2026-2103VulnerabilityPublished 6 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-2103: Infor SyteLine ERP · CWE-321

Affects Infor SyteLine ERPSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.1 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 1% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 6 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
InforSyteLine ERP	Affected =10.0.8803.16889	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately implement strict access controls to limit who can access the application binaries and databases containing encrypted credentials. Employ file integrity monitoring and audit logging to detect unauthorized access attempts. Network segmentation should be used to isolate ERP systems from less trusted network zones. Until a vendor patch is available, consider encrypting sensitive data at rest using external mechanisms or database-level encryption with unique keys. Regularly review and rotate credentials stored within the ERP system where possible. Conduct thorough security assessments and penetration tests focusing on local privilege escalation and lateral movement scenarios. Engage with Infor for timely updates and patches, and plan for rapid deployment once fixes are released. Additionally, educate system administrators about the risks of hard-coded keys and encourage secure development practices for future deployments.

Description

Infor SyteLine ERP uses hard-coded static cryptographic keys to encrypt stored credentials, including user passwords, database connection strings, and API keys. The encryption keys are identical across all installations. An attacker with access to the application binary and database can decrypt all stored credentials.

Impact

For European organizations using Infor SyteLine ERP, this vulnerability could result in the exposure of highly sensitive credentials, including user passwords and database connection strings. Such exposure can lead to unauthorized access to the ERP system, enabling attackers to manipulate business processes, steal intellectual property, or move laterally within the network to compromise additional systems. The integrity of stored data could be undermined if attackers alter credentials or configuration settings. Although availability is not directly impacted, the resulting breaches could cause operational disruptions and reputational damage. Given the ERP system’s role in managing critical business functions such as supply chain, finance, and manufacturing, the impact could be severe, especially for industries with stringent regulatory requirements like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing prevalent in Europe. Additionally, the uniformity of the encryption keys across all installations increases the risk that a single compromise could be leveraged against multiple organizations, amplifying the threat landscape.

CWE-321Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A04:2025: Cryptographic Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product uses a hard-coded, unchangeable cryptographic key.
Architecture and Design
Prevention schemes mirror that of hard-coded password storage.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Transport Layer Protection (opens in a new tab)
User Privacy Protection (opens in a new tab)
Password Storage (opens in a new tab)
Cryptographic Storage (opens in a new tab)
HSTS (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V2.6.2 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

blog.blacklanternsecurity.com/p/cve-2026-2103-infor-syteline-erp (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 6 Feb 2026, 16:59 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-321

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats