CVE-2026-2111VulnerabilityPublished 7 Feb 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-2111: JeecgBoot · Path Traversal

Affects JeecgBootSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 48% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
JeecgBoot	Affected =3.0 =3.1 =3.2 =3.3 =3.4 =3.5 =3.6 =3.7 =3.8 =3.9.0	Fixed in–
Mavenorg.jeecg/jeecgboot`pkg:maven/org.jeecg/jeecgboot`Other threats	Affected =3.0 =3.1 =3.2 =3.3 =3.4 =3.5 =3.6 =3.7 =3.8 =3.9.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting access to the /airag/knowledge/doc/edit endpoint via network controls such as firewalls or web application firewalls (WAF) to limit exposure to trusted IPs only. 2. Implement input validation and sanitization on the filePath parameter to prevent directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../) from being processed. 3. Employ least privilege principles on the file system permissions to ensure the application process cannot access sensitive directories or files outside its intended scope. 4. Monitor logs for suspicious requests containing path traversal patterns targeting the vulnerable endpoint. 5. If possible, upgrade to a patched version once the vendor releases a fix or apply community-provided patches or workarounds. 6. Conduct a thorough security review of all modules handling file paths to identify and remediate similar issues. 7. Consider deploying runtime application self-protection (RASP) or enhanced endpoint detection to detect and block exploitation attempts. 8. Educate development teams on secure coding practices related to file handling to prevent recurrence.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.9.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /airag/knowledge/doc/edit of the component Retrieval-Augmented Generation Module. Executing a manipulation of the argument filePath can lead to path traversal. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is unauthorized access to files on the affected server, which can lead to disclosure of sensitive information such as configuration files, source code, credentials, or other protected data. This can compromise confidentiality and potentially facilitate further attacks like privilege escalation or lateral movement within the network. Since the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication or user interaction, attackers can scan and exploit vulnerable instances at scale. Organizations relying on JeecgBoot for internal or external applications risk data breaches and operational disruption. The medium severity score reflects that while the vulnerability does not directly allow code execution or denial of service, the information disclosure can have serious downstream consequences. The absence of vendor patches and public exploits increases the urgency for organizations to implement mitigations. If exploited in sensitive environments, such as government or critical infrastructure sectors, the impact could be significant, including regulatory penalties and reputational damage.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Feb 2026, 21:28 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats