CVE-2026-2163VulnerabilityPublished 8 Feb 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-2163: D-Link DIR-600 · Command Injection

Affects D-Link DIR-600Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium · end of life, no fix coming : replace or isolate D-Link DIR-600; no fix will be released.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 6.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 93% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: None coming – the product is end of life

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

No fix will be released: D-Link DIR-600 is end of life. Replace it, or isolate it from untrusted networks until you can.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
D-LinkDIR-600	Affected =2.15WWb02	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of official patches due to end-of-life status, organizations should prioritize replacing the affected D-Link DIR-600 devices with modern, supported hardware that receives regular security updates. If immediate replacement is not feasible, network segmentation should be implemented to isolate vulnerable routers from critical assets and sensitive data. Disable or restrict access to the ssdp.cgi interface and related services if possible, and limit administrative access to trusted networks only. Employ network-level protections such as firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems to monitor and block suspicious traffic targeting the vulnerable parameters. Regularly audit network devices for outdated firmware and maintain an inventory to identify unsupported hardware. Educate users and administrators about the risks of legacy devices and encourage timely upgrades. Additionally, consider deploying network anomaly detection tools to identify unusual command injection attempts or exploitation activity targeting these routers.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in D-Link DIR-600 up to 2.15WWb02. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file ssdp.cgi. Such manipulation of the argument HTTP_ST/REMOTE_ADDR/REMOTE_PORT/SERVER_ID leads to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-2163 is unauthorized command execution on affected D-Link DIR-600 routers, which can compromise device integrity and potentially allow attackers to manipulate network traffic or gain deeper access into internal networks. Although the CVSS score is medium, the exploitability combined with the availability of public exploit code increases the risk, especially in environments where these legacy devices remain operational. Compromised routers can be used as pivot points for further attacks, including man-in-the-middle, data exfiltration, or launching attacks against other networked systems. The lack of vendor support and patches exacerbates the risk, as vulnerabilities remain unmitigated. Organizations relying on these devices may face increased exposure to cyberattacks, data breaches, and operational disruptions. The threat is particularly relevant for small to medium enterprises and home users who may still use outdated D-Link DIR-600 routers without adequate security controls.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Feb 2026, 21:39 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats