Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-2271: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7Source CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.3 Low.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
3.3Low
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 43% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 26 Mar 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6gimpAffected–Fixed in–
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7gimpAffected–Fixed in–
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8gimp:2.8/gimpAffected–Fixed in–
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9gimpAffected–Fixed in–

AI-suggested

No explicit patch or workaround information is provided in the available data. Until a patch is confirmed, avoid processing untrusted PSP image files with the affected GIMP parser to mitigate risk.

Description

A flaw was found in GIMP's PSP (Paint Shop Pro) file parser. A remote attacker could exploit an integer overflow vulnerability in the read_creator_block() function by providing a specially crafted PSP image file. This vulnerability occurs when a 32-bit length value from the file is used for memory allocation without proper validation, leading to a heap overflow and an out-of-bounds write. Successful exploitation could result in an application level denial of service.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…