Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-22800: CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in THM-Health PILOS

0
Low
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-22800cvecve-2026-22800cwe-352
Published: Mon Jan 12 2026 (01/12/2026, 22:09:56 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: THM-Health
Product: PILOS

Description

CVE-2026-22800 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in THM-Health's PILOS platform versions prior to 4. 10. 0. The vulnerability exists in an administrative API endpoint that terminates all active video conferences on a server via an HTTP GET request. Although authorization checks prevent cross-site exploitation, the use of GET allows same-site content to trigger this destructive action without explicit administrator intent. This can cause disruption by terminating all ongoing video conferences unexpectedly. The vulnerability has a low CVSS score of 2. 4 and requires authenticated administrator interaction with crafted content. The issue is fixed in version 4. 10.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/21/2026, 03:04:24 UTC

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability CVE-2026-22800 affects PILOS, a frontend for BigBlueButton used for live online seminars. The flaw lies in an administrative API endpoint responsible for terminating all active video conferences on a server. This endpoint is accessible via an HTTP GET request, which is inappropriate for destructive actions as GET requests are expected to be safe and idempotent. Although proper authorization checks are in place, preventing cross-site exploitation, the endpoint can be triggered implicitly through same-site content, such as embedded resources within the application interface. This means that an authenticated administrator, while browsing or interacting with crafted content inside the application, may unknowingly invoke the endpoint, causing an unintended termination of all active video conferences. This vulnerability is classified under CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery). The impact on confidentiality and integrity is minimal since authorization is enforced and no data leakage occurs, but availability is affected due to the forced termination of active sessions. The vulnerability is fixed in PILOS version 4.10.0 by presumably changing the HTTP method or adding CSRF protections. No known exploits are reported in the wild, and the CVSS v3.1 base score is 2.4, reflecting a low severity primarily due to the requirement for administrator privileges and user interaction.

Potential Impact

For European organizations using PILOS versions prior to 4.10.0, this vulnerability could lead to denial of service for live online seminars and video conferences by abruptly terminating all active sessions on a server. This disruption could affect critical meetings, training sessions, or educational activities, potentially causing operational delays and reputational damage. Since the vulnerability requires an authenticated administrator to interact with crafted content, the risk is somewhat limited to insider threats or targeted social engineering attacks. However, in environments where PILOS is heavily used for remote collaboration or e-learning, such disruptions could impact productivity and continuity. The impact on confidentiality and integrity is negligible, but availability is compromised. Organizations relying on PILOS for critical communication should prioritize patching to avoid service interruptions.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should upgrade PILOS to version 4.10.0 or later, where this vulnerability is fixed. Until upgrading, administrators should avoid interacting with untrusted or suspicious content within the application to prevent inadvertent triggering of the endpoint. Implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) and restricting embedded content can reduce the risk of same-site CSRF triggers. Additionally, reviewing and restricting administrative access to trusted personnel only will limit exposure. Monitoring logs for unusual API calls to the termination endpoint can help detect attempted exploitation. Finally, consider isolating the administrative interface from general user access or using multi-factor authentication to reduce the risk of compromised administrator accounts.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-01-09T22:50:10.287Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69657471da2266e83834ab9b

Added to database: 1/12/2026, 10:23:45 PM

Last enriched: 1/21/2026, 3:04:24 AM

Last updated: 2/27/2026, 3:57:09 AM

Views: 54

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses