Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-22870: CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) in DataDog guarddog

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-22870cvecve-2026-22870cwe-409
Published: Tue Jan 13 2026 (01/13/2026, 20:43:43 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: DataDog
Product: guarddog

Description

CVE-2026-22870 is a high-severity vulnerability in DataDog's GuardDog CLI tool versions prior to 2. 7. 1. The flaw arises from improper handling of highly compressed ZIP archives during extraction, specifically a lack of validation on decompressed file sizes. This allows attackers to craft malicious PyPI packages containing zip bombs that expand to consume gigabytes of disk space from a few megabytes of compressed data, leading to denial of service (DoS). Exploitation requires no privileges but does require user interaction to extract the malicious archive. The vulnerability impacts the availability of systems running vulnerable GuardDog versions. The issue has been fixed in version 2. 7. 1.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/21/2026, 02:56:21 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-22870 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-409 (Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data) found in DataDog's GuardDog CLI tool, which is used to identify malicious Python packages from PyPI. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 2.7.1 due to the safe_extract() function not validating the size of files after decompression when extracting ZIP archives such as wheels or eggs. Attackers can exploit this by crafting malicious Python packages that contain zip bombs—highly compressed archives that decompress into extremely large files or file structures. When GuardDog extracts these archives, the decompressed data can consume gigabytes of disk space from only a few megabytes of compressed input, leading to resource exhaustion and denial of service. The vulnerability does not require any privileges or authentication but does require user interaction to trigger extraction. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 7.1 (high severity), reflecting the network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and high impact on availability. Although no known exploits are reported in the wild yet, the risk is significant due to the potential for disruption in automated package scanning workflows. The issue was addressed in GuardDog version 2.7.1 by adding proper validation of decompressed file sizes to prevent zip bomb attacks.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, especially those involved in software development, DevOps, or security operations using Python and DataDog tools, this vulnerability poses a risk of denial of service. Automated pipelines that rely on GuardDog to scan PyPI packages could be disrupted by malicious packages designed to exhaust disk space, potentially halting CI/CD processes or security scans. This can lead to operational downtime, delayed deployments, and increased incident response costs. Organizations with limited disk space or those running GuardDog on critical infrastructure may experience more severe impacts. Additionally, the disruption could be leveraged as a diversion tactic in multi-stage attacks. While confidentiality and integrity are not directly impacted, availability degradation can have cascading effects on business continuity and security posture.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should immediately upgrade GuardDog to version 2.7.1 or later to ensure the vulnerability is patched. In addition, implement the following measures: 1) Enforce strict resource quotas and disk usage limits on environments running GuardDog to contain potential zip bomb effects. 2) Use sandboxed or isolated environments for package extraction to prevent system-wide resource exhaustion. 3) Monitor disk usage and set alerts for unusual spikes during package scanning activities. 4) Integrate additional scanning tools that analyze package contents for suspicious compression ratios before extraction. 5) Educate developers and security teams about the risks of zip bombs and encourage cautious handling of untrusted packages. 6) Review and harden CI/CD pipeline configurations to gracefully handle failures caused by resource exhaustion. These targeted mitigations complement the patch and reduce the risk of denial of service from malicious compressed archives.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-01-12T16:20:16.747Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6966b182a60475309fb4b272

Added to database: 1/13/2026, 8:56:34 PM

Last enriched: 1/21/2026, 2:56:21 AM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 7:15:29 AM

Views: 64

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats