Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-22871: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in DataDog guarddog

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-22871cvecve-2026-22871cwe-22
Published: Tue Jan 13 2026 (01/13/2026, 20:46:57 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: DataDog
Product: guarddog

Description

CVE-2026-22871 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in DataDog's GuardDog CLI tool versions prior to 2. 7. 1. The flaw exists in the safe_extract() function, allowing malicious PyPI packages to write files outside the intended extraction directory. This arbitrary file overwrite can lead to remote code execution without requiring authentication, though user interaction is needed to trigger the extraction. The vulnerability has a CVSS 4. 0 score of 8. 7, indicating a significant risk. GuardDog is used to identify malicious PyPI packages, so compromised environments could be exploited by attackers to execute arbitrary code. The issue is fixed in version 2.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/21/2026, 02:56:35 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-22871 is a path traversal vulnerability classified under CWE-22 found in DataDog's GuardDog CLI tool, which is designed to detect malicious PyPI packages. The vulnerability resides in the safe_extract() function used to unpack package contents. Prior to version 2.7.1, this function improperly limits pathnames, allowing crafted PyPI packages to escape the intended extraction directory. This enables attackers to overwrite arbitrary files on the victim system, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE). The vulnerability does not require privileges or authentication but does require user interaction to trigger the extraction process. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 reflects the vulnerability's network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no authentication, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the flaw poses a severe risk to environments where GuardDog is used to analyze PyPI packages, as attackers could craft malicious packages to compromise systems. The issue was publicly disclosed on January 13, 2026, and fixed in GuardDog version 2.7.1. Organizations relying on GuardDog for supply chain security should upgrade immediately and review their package extraction workflows to detect any signs of exploitation.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2026-22871 is significant due to the widespread use of Python and reliance on supply chain security tools like GuardDog. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary file overwrite and remote code execution, compromising system integrity and potentially allowing attackers to deploy malware, steal sensitive data, or disrupt operations. This risk is heightened in sectors with critical infrastructure, software development, and cloud services, where Python package management is integral. The vulnerability could facilitate lateral movement within networks or persistent footholds if exploited. Given the high CVSS score and the lack of required privileges or authentication, even less privileged users or automated processes could trigger exploitation. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests a window for proactive mitigation, but the potential for rapid weaponization remains. European organizations must consider the risk to their software supply chain security and the broader implications for operational continuity and data protection compliance under regulations like GDPR.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Immediately upgrade GuardDog to version 2.7.1 or later to apply the official fix for the path traversal vulnerability. 2. Audit all systems running GuardDog to identify any usage of vulnerable versions and remove or isolate affected instances. 3. Implement strict monitoring and logging of package extraction activities, focusing on unexpected file writes outside designated directories. 4. Employ file integrity monitoring solutions to detect unauthorized changes to critical system files that could result from exploitation. 5. Restrict user permissions and execution contexts for GuardDog to minimize the impact of potential exploitation, such as running it in sandboxed or containerized environments. 6. Review and tighten supply chain security policies, including verifying package sources and hashes before extraction. 7. Educate developers and security teams about the risks of malicious PyPI packages and the importance of timely updates. 8. Consider network segmentation and endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to detect and contain suspicious activities related to package analysis workflows.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-01-12T16:20:16.747Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6966b182a60475309fb4b276

Added to database: 1/13/2026, 8:56:34 PM

Last enriched: 1/21/2026, 2:56:35 AM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 12:23:46 AM

Views: 65

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats