Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-23157: Linux kernel · btrfs: do not strictly require dirty metadata threshold for metadata writepages

Affects Linux kernelSource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · fixed in bb9be3f713652e330df00f3724c18c7a5469e7ac : update Linux kernel when convenient.

Data as of 5 Nov 2026, 21:34 UTC

Severity
Unrated

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

Thin evidence

One scorer or none
CISA SSVC
Exploitation
No evidence of active exploitation and no public proof of concept
Automatable
Attackers cannot reliably automate steps 1–4 of the kill chain
Technical impact
Limited control over the software or limited information exposure

CISA SSVC assessment, 2026-11-05.

Patch
Available – fixed in bb9be3f713652e330df00f3724c18c7a5469e7ac, 629666d20c7dcd740e193ec0631fdff035b1f7d6, 4357e02cafabe01c2d737ceb4c4c6382fc2ee10a +3

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 14 Feb 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 5 Nov 2026.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 793955bca66c99defdffc857ae6eb7e8431d6bbe, < bb9be3f713652e330df00f3724c18c7a5469e7ac
Fixed in
  • bb9be3f713652e330df00f3724c18c7a5469e7ac
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 793955bca66c99defdffc857ae6eb7e8431d6bbe, < 629666d20c7dcd740e193ec0631fdff035b1f7d6
Fixed in
  • 629666d20c7dcd740e193ec0631fdff035b1f7d6
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 793955bca66c99defdffc857ae6eb7e8431d6bbe, < 4357e02cafabe01c2d737ceb4c4c6382fc2ee10a
Fixed in
  • 4357e02cafabe01c2d737ceb4c4c6382fc2ee10a
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 793955bca66c99defdffc857ae6eb7e8431d6bbe, < 6a8b6242eaa1dd7a0de2d6de6420d10ffe68db90
Fixed in
  • 6a8b6242eaa1dd7a0de2d6de6420d10ffe68db90
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 793955bca66c99defdffc857ae6eb7e8431d6bbe, < 4e159150a9a56d66d247f4b5510bed46fe58aa1c
Fixed in
  • 4e159150a9a56d66d247f4b5510bed46fe58aa1c
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 793955bca66c99defdffc857ae6eb7e8431d6bbe, < 0c3666ec188640c20e254011e7adf4464c32ee58
Fixed in
  • 0c3666ec188640c20e254011e7adf4464c32ee58

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not strictly require dirty metadata threshold for metadata writepages [BUG] There is an internal report that over 1000 processes are waiting at the io_schedule_timeout() of balance_dirty_pages(), causing a system hang and trigger a kernel coredump. The kernel is v6.4 kernel based, but the root problem still applies to any upstream kernel before v6.18. [CAUSE] From Jan Kara for his wisdom on the dirty page balance behavior first. This cgroup dirty limit was what was actually playing the role here because the cgroup had only a small amount of memory and so the dirty limit for it was something like 16MB. Dirty throttling is responsible for enforcing that nobody can dirty (significantly) more dirty memory than there's dirty limit. Thus when a task is dirtying pages it periodically enters into balance_dirty_pages() and we let it sleep there to slow down the dirtying. When the system is over dirty limit already (either globally or within a cgroup of the running task), we will not let the task exit from balance_dirty_pages() until the number of dirty pages drops below the limit. So in this particular case, as I already mentioned, there was a cgroup with relatively small amount of memory and as a result with dirty limit set at 16MB. A task from that cgroup has dirtied about 28MB worth of pages in btrfs btree inode and these were practically the only dirty pages in that cgroup. So that means the only way to reduce the dirty pages of that cgroup is to writeback the dirty pages of btrfs btree inode, and only after that those processes can exit balance_dirty_pages(). Now back to the btrfs part, btree_writepages() is responsible for writing back dirty btree inode pages. The problem here is, there is a btrfs internal threshold that if the btree inode's dirty bytes are below the 32M threshold, it will not do any writeback. This behavior is to batch as much metadata as possible so we won't write back those tree blocks and then later re-COW them again for another modification. This internal 32MiB is higher than the existing dirty page size (28MiB), meaning no writeback will happen, causing a deadlock between btrfs and cgroup: - Btrfs doesn't want to write back btree inode until more dirty pages - Cgroup/MM doesn't want more dirty pages for btrfs btree inode Thus any process touching that btree inode is put into sleep until the number of dirty pages is reduced. Thanks Jan Kara a lot for the analysis of the root cause. [ENHANCEMENT] Since kernel commit b55102826d7d ("btrfs: set AS_KERNEL_FILE on the btree_inode"), btrfs btree inode pages will only be charged to the root cgroup which should have a much larger limit than btrfs' 32MiB threshold. So it should not affect newer kernels. But for all current LTS kernels, they are all affected by this problem, and backporting the whole AS_KERNEL_FILE may not be a good idea. Even for newer kernels I still think it's a good idea to get rid of the internal threshold at btree_writepages(), since for most cases cgroup/MM has a better view of full system memory usage than btrfs' fixed threshold. For internal callers using btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() since that function is already doing internal threshold check, we don't need to bother them. But for external callers of btree_writepages(), just respect their requests and write back whatever they want, ignoring the internal btrfs threshold to avoid such deadlock on btree inode dirty page balancing.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…