CVE-2026-2316VulnerabilityPublished 11 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-2316: Google Chrome · Insufficient policy enforcement

Affects Google ChromeSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium : upgrade to 145.0.7632.45 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 17% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 145.0.7632.45

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Google Chrome to 145.0.7632.45.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GoogleChrome	Affected >=145.0.7632.45 <145.0.7632.45	Fixed in 145.0.7632.45

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-2316, organizations should prioritize updating Google Chrome to version 145.0.7632.45 or later, where the vulnerability is addressed. Additionally, organizations should implement user training focused on recognizing phishing and UI spoofing attempts, emphasizing caution when interacting with unfamiliar or suspicious web content. Deploying browser security extensions that detect or block malicious scripts and frames can add a layer of defense. Network-level protections such as web filtering and intrusion prevention systems should be configured to block known malicious URLs and content. For high-risk environments, consider restricting the use of frames or sandboxing browser sessions to limit potential attack surfaces. Continuous monitoring for suspicious user activity and incident response readiness are also recommended to quickly address any exploitation attempts.

Description

Insufficient policy enforcement in Frames in Google Chrome prior to 145.0.7632.45 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-2316 is on the integrity of user interactions within Google Chrome. By enabling UI spoofing, attackers can deceive users into performing actions they did not intend, such as submitting credentials, authorizing transactions, or clicking malicious links. This can lead to downstream consequences including credential theft, unauthorized access, or malware installation. Since the vulnerability requires user interaction, the risk is elevated in environments where users are less security-aware or where phishing attacks are common. There is no direct impact on confidentiality or availability, but the indirect effects of successful UI spoofing can be significant. Organizations worldwide that rely on Chrome for web access, especially those with high-value targets or sensitive data, face increased risk of social engineering attacks exploiting this vulnerability. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk, but the medium severity and ease of exploitation warrant prompt attention to prevent future attacks.

CWE-451User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The user interface (UI) does not properly represent critical information to the user, allowing the information - or its source - to be obscured or spoofed. This is often a component in phishing attacks.
Implementation · Input Validation
Perform data validation (e.g. syntax, length, etc.) before interpreting the data.
Architecture and Design · Output Encoding
Create a strategy for presenting information, and plan for how to display unusual characters.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Spear Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Mobile Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Resource Location Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
Action Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 19 Feb 2026, 14:08 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-451

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats