CVE-2026-23476VulnerabilityPublished 2 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-23476: NeoRazorX facturascripts · Cross-site Scripting

Affects NeoRazorX facturascriptsSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium : upgrade to 2025.8 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2025.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade facturascripts and neorazorx/facturascripts to 2025.8.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
NeoRazorXfacturascripts	Affected <2025.8	Fixed in 2025.8
GitHubneorazorx/facturascripts`pkg:github/neorazorx/facturascripts`Other threats	Affected <2025.8	Fixed in 2025.8

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

The primary mitigation is to upgrade FacturaScripts to version 2025.8 or later, where the vulnerability is fixed. Until upgrade is possible, organizations should implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application and database layers to prevent injection of malicious input that triggers error messages. Web application firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block suspicious input patterns that may exploit this XSS flaw. Educate users to avoid interacting with suspicious links or inputs that could trigger error messages. Limit user privileges to the minimum necessary to reduce the risk of exploitation by low-privilege attackers. Regularly audit and monitor application logs for unusual error message patterns or signs of attempted exploitation. Finally, ensure secure coding practices are followed in customizations or plugins to avoid similar issues.

Description

CVE-2026-23476 is a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FacturaScripts, an open-source ERP and accounting software by NeoRazorX, affecting versions prior to 2025.8. The flaw arises from improper sanitization when displaying error messages triggered by database input errors, due to the use of Twig's | raw filter which bypasses HTML escaping. An attacker can exploit this by causing a database error with crafted input, leading to execution of malicious scripts in the victim's browser. The vulnerability requires low privileges but does require user interaction and results in partial confidentiality and integrity impact without affecting availability. It is rated medium severity with a CVSS score of 5.4 and has no known exploits in the wild. The issue is fixed in version 2025.8. European organizations using vulnerable versions of FacturaScripts, especially in finance and accounting roles, should prioritize patching to prevent potential targeted attacks.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily to confidentiality and integrity of user sessions and data. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary scripts in users' browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions within the FacturaScripts application. Given FacturaScripts' role in financial and accounting processes, such attacks could facilitate fraud or data leakage. Although availability is not impacted, the trustworthiness of financial data and user accounts could be compromised. The requirement for authenticated access and user interaction limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with many users or where social engineering is feasible. Organizations in Europe with extensive SME sectors relying on FacturaScripts for ERP and accounting functions are at heightened risk. The absence of known exploits suggests limited active targeting currently, but the vulnerability remains exploitable until patched.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 10 Feb 2026, 11:09 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats