Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-23527: CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in h3js h3

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-23527cvecve-2026-23527cwe-444
Published: Thu Jan 15 2026 (01/15/2026, 19:24:20 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: h3js
Product: h3

Description

H3 is a minimal H(TTP) framework built for high performance and portability. Prior to 1.15.5, there is a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability. readRawBody is doing a strict case-sensitive check for the Transfer-Encoding header. It explicitly looks for "chunked", but per the RFC, this header should be case-insensitive. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.5.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/15/2026, 20:15:55 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-23527 is a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability found in the h3js h3 HTTP framework, specifically in versions prior to 1.15.5. The vulnerability stems from the readRawBody function performing a strict case-sensitive check on the Transfer-Encoding HTTP header, only recognizing the value "chunked" in lowercase. According to RFC standards, HTTP headers and their values should be treated case-insensitively. This discrepancy allows attackers to craft malicious HTTP requests with Transfer-Encoding headers using different casing (e.g., "Chunked" or "CHUNKED") that are not properly detected by the h3 framework. As a result, front-end and back-end servers may interpret the boundaries of HTTP requests differently, enabling HTTP Request Smuggling attacks. These attacks can allow an attacker to bypass security controls, poison web caches, hijack user sessions, perform cross-site scripting, or cause partial denial of service by desynchronizing request parsing. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.9 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L), indicating it is exploitable remotely without authentication but requires high attack complexity. The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the vulnerability affects components beyond the vulnerable one. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the nature of HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerabilities historically makes them attractive targets for attackers. The issue was addressed in h3 version 1.15.5 by making the Transfer-Encoding header check case-insensitive, aligning with RFC compliance. Organizations using h3 versions below 1.15.5 in their web servers or proxies should urgently upgrade to mitigate this risk.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to web infrastructure that relies on the h3 HTTP framework. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, session hijacking, web cache poisoning, and partial denial of service, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and e-commerce, which handle sensitive personal and financial data, are particularly at risk. The ability to remotely exploit this vulnerability without authentication increases the threat level. Additionally, the desynchronization of HTTP request parsing can undermine existing security controls like WAFs and intrusion detection systems, complicating incident detection and response. Given Europe's strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR), exploitation could also result in regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Organizations with internet-facing services using vulnerable h3 versions should consider this a critical security issue requiring immediate remediation.

Mitigation Recommendations

Beyond the essential step of upgrading h3 to version 1.15.5 or later, organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Conduct a thorough inventory of all systems and services using the h3 framework to identify vulnerable instances. 2) Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules specifically designed to detect and block HTTP Request Smuggling attempts, focusing on anomalies in Transfer-Encoding headers and request parsing inconsistencies. 3) Implement strict HTTP header normalization at the edge or proxy level to enforce case-insensitive handling of headers per RFC standards. 4) Monitor HTTP traffic logs for unusual patterns indicative of request smuggling, such as unexpected request lengths or malformed headers. 5) Perform penetration testing and security assessments targeting HTTP request parsing logic to validate the effectiveness of mitigations. 6) Educate development and operations teams about the risks of HTTP Request Smuggling and the importance of adhering to protocol specifications. 7) Where possible, segment critical web infrastructure to limit the blast radius of potential exploitation. These targeted measures complement patching and enhance overall resilience against this class of vulnerabilities.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-01-13T18:22:43.981Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6969476c1ab3796b1034af92

Added to database: 1/15/2026, 8:00:44 PM

Last enriched: 1/15/2026, 8:15:55 PM

Last updated: 1/15/2026, 9:53:20 PM

Views: 6

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats