CVE-2026-23527: CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in h3js h3
H3 is a minimal H(TTP) framework built for high performance and portability. Prior to 1.15.5, there is a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability. readRawBody is doing a strict case-sensitive check for the Transfer-Encoding header. It explicitly looks for "chunked", but per the RFC, this header should be case-insensitive. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.5.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-23527 is a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability found in the h3js h3 HTTP framework, specifically in versions prior to 1.15.5. The vulnerability stems from the readRawBody function performing a strict case-sensitive check on the Transfer-Encoding HTTP header, only recognizing the value "chunked" in lowercase. According to RFC standards, HTTP headers and their values should be treated case-insensitively. This discrepancy allows attackers to craft malicious HTTP requests with Transfer-Encoding headers using different casing (e.g., "Chunked" or "CHUNKED") that are not properly detected by the h3 framework. As a result, front-end and back-end servers may interpret the boundaries of HTTP requests differently, enabling HTTP Request Smuggling attacks. These attacks can allow an attacker to bypass security controls, poison web caches, hijack user sessions, perform cross-site scripting, or cause partial denial of service by desynchronizing request parsing. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.9 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L), indicating it is exploitable remotely without authentication but requires high attack complexity. The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the vulnerability affects components beyond the vulnerable one. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the nature of HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerabilities historically makes them attractive targets for attackers. The issue was addressed in h3 version 1.15.5 by making the Transfer-Encoding header check case-insensitive, aligning with RFC compliance. Organizations using h3 versions below 1.15.5 in their web servers or proxies should urgently upgrade to mitigate this risk.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to web infrastructure that relies on the h3 HTTP framework. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, session hijacking, web cache poisoning, and partial denial of service, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and e-commerce, which handle sensitive personal and financial data, are particularly at risk. The ability to remotely exploit this vulnerability without authentication increases the threat level. Additionally, the desynchronization of HTTP request parsing can undermine existing security controls like WAFs and intrusion detection systems, complicating incident detection and response. Given Europe's strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR), exploitation could also result in regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Organizations with internet-facing services using vulnerable h3 versions should consider this a critical security issue requiring immediate remediation.
Mitigation Recommendations
Beyond the essential step of upgrading h3 to version 1.15.5 or later, organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Conduct a thorough inventory of all systems and services using the h3 framework to identify vulnerable instances. 2) Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules specifically designed to detect and block HTTP Request Smuggling attempts, focusing on anomalies in Transfer-Encoding headers and request parsing inconsistencies. 3) Implement strict HTTP header normalization at the edge or proxy level to enforce case-insensitive handling of headers per RFC standards. 4) Monitor HTTP traffic logs for unusual patterns indicative of request smuggling, such as unexpected request lengths or malformed headers. 5) Perform penetration testing and security assessments targeting HTTP request parsing logic to validate the effectiveness of mitigations. 6) Educate development and operations teams about the risks of HTTP Request Smuggling and the importance of adhering to protocol specifications. 7) Where possible, segment critical web infrastructure to limit the blast radius of potential exploitation. These targeted measures complement patching and enhance overall resilience against this class of vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain
CVE-2026-23527: CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in h3js h3
Description
H3 is a minimal H(TTP) framework built for high performance and portability. Prior to 1.15.5, there is a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability. readRawBody is doing a strict case-sensitive check for the Transfer-Encoding header. It explicitly looks for "chunked", but per the RFC, this header should be case-insensitive. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.5.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-23527 is a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability found in the h3js h3 HTTP framework, specifically in versions prior to 1.15.5. The vulnerability stems from the readRawBody function performing a strict case-sensitive check on the Transfer-Encoding HTTP header, only recognizing the value "chunked" in lowercase. According to RFC standards, HTTP headers and their values should be treated case-insensitively. This discrepancy allows attackers to craft malicious HTTP requests with Transfer-Encoding headers using different casing (e.g., "Chunked" or "CHUNKED") that are not properly detected by the h3 framework. As a result, front-end and back-end servers may interpret the boundaries of HTTP requests differently, enabling HTTP Request Smuggling attacks. These attacks can allow an attacker to bypass security controls, poison web caches, hijack user sessions, perform cross-site scripting, or cause partial denial of service by desynchronizing request parsing. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.9 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L), indicating it is exploitable remotely without authentication but requires high attack complexity. The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the vulnerability affects components beyond the vulnerable one. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the nature of HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerabilities historically makes them attractive targets for attackers. The issue was addressed in h3 version 1.15.5 by making the Transfer-Encoding header check case-insensitive, aligning with RFC compliance. Organizations using h3 versions below 1.15.5 in their web servers or proxies should urgently upgrade to mitigate this risk.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to web infrastructure that relies on the h3 HTTP framework. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, session hijacking, web cache poisoning, and partial denial of service, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and e-commerce, which handle sensitive personal and financial data, are particularly at risk. The ability to remotely exploit this vulnerability without authentication increases the threat level. Additionally, the desynchronization of HTTP request parsing can undermine existing security controls like WAFs and intrusion detection systems, complicating incident detection and response. Given Europe's strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR), exploitation could also result in regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Organizations with internet-facing services using vulnerable h3 versions should consider this a critical security issue requiring immediate remediation.
Mitigation Recommendations
Beyond the essential step of upgrading h3 to version 1.15.5 or later, organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Conduct a thorough inventory of all systems and services using the h3 framework to identify vulnerable instances. 2) Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules specifically designed to detect and block HTTP Request Smuggling attempts, focusing on anomalies in Transfer-Encoding headers and request parsing inconsistencies. 3) Implement strict HTTP header normalization at the edge or proxy level to enforce case-insensitive handling of headers per RFC standards. 4) Monitor HTTP traffic logs for unusual patterns indicative of request smuggling, such as unexpected request lengths or malformed headers. 5) Perform penetration testing and security assessments targeting HTTP request parsing logic to validate the effectiveness of mitigations. 6) Educate development and operations teams about the risks of HTTP Request Smuggling and the importance of adhering to protocol specifications. 7) Where possible, segment critical web infrastructure to limit the blast radius of potential exploitation. These targeted measures complement patching and enhance overall resilience against this class of vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-13T18:22:43.981Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6969476c1ab3796b1034af92
Added to database: 1/15/2026, 8:00:44 PM
Last enriched: 1/15/2026, 8:15:55 PM
Last updated: 1/15/2026, 9:53:20 PM
Views: 6
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-67822: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-59959: CWE-822 Untrusted Pointer Dereference in Juniper Networks Junos OS
MediumCVE-2025-52987: CWE-1021 Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames in Juniper Networks Paragon Automation (Pathfinder, Planner, Insights)
MediumCVE-2025-65368: n/a
MediumCVE-2025-67025: n/a
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.