CVE-2026-23567VulnerabilityPublished 29 Jan 2026

CVE-2026-23567: TeamViewer DEX · Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Affects TeamViewer DEXSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium : upgrade to 26.1 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 28% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 26.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade TeamViewer DEX to 26.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TeamViewerDEX	Affected <26.1	Fixed in 26.1

AI-suggested

1. Monitor TeamViewer communications and network traffic for unusual or malformed UDP packets targeting NomadBranch.exe. 2. Restrict UDP traffic to and from TeamViewer DEX clients to trusted and necessary network segments only, using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit adjacent network exposure. 3. Prepare to apply the official patch or update to TeamViewer DEX version 26.1 or later as soon as it becomes available from the vendor. 4. Implement network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) with signatures or anomaly detection for suspicious UDP traffic patterns related to this vulnerability. 5. Conduct internal network audits to ensure that only authorized devices have access to the network segments where TeamViewer DEX operates. 6. Educate IT staff about the vulnerability and ensure incident response plans include steps for handling potential service crashes related to this issue. 7. Consider temporary disabling or limiting the use of the Content Distribution Service component if feasible until patched. 8. Maintain regular backups and system monitoring to quickly recover from potential denial-of-service incidents.

Description

An integer underflow in the UDP command handler of the TeamViewer DEX Client (former 1E Client) - Content Distribution Service (NomadBranch.exe) prior version 26.1 for Windows allows an adjacent network attacker to trigger a heap-based buffer overflow and cause a denial-of-service (service crash) via specially crafted UDP packets.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact is service disruption due to denial-of-service caused by the crash of the TeamViewer DEX Content Distribution Service. This can interrupt remote management, content distribution, or other operational processes relying on TeamViewer DEX, potentially affecting business continuity. Since the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the risk of data breaches is low. However, availability interruptions can affect IT support, remote work capabilities, and automated content delivery, which are critical in sectors like finance, manufacturing, and public services. Organizations with extensive remote infrastructure or those relying heavily on TeamViewer DEX for operational tasks may experience operational delays or increased support costs. The requirement for adjacent network access limits the attack surface to local network environments or VPNs, reducing remote exploitation risk but emphasizing the need for internal network security. No known exploits in the wild reduce immediate risk but do not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits post-disclosure.

CWE-122Heap-based Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #16
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and Design
Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Forced Integer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

teamviewer.com/en/resources/trust-center/security-bulletins/tv-2026-1001/ (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 29 Jan 2026, 09:28 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-122

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats