CVE-2026-23744: CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function in MCPJam inspector
MCPJam inspector is the local-first development platform for MCP servers. Versions 1.4.2 and earlier are vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to send a crafted HTTP request that triggers the installation of an MCP server, leading to RCE. Since MCPJam inspector by default listens on 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, an attacker can trigger the RCE remotely via a simple HTTP request. Version 1.4.3 contains a patch.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-23744 is a critical security vulnerability classified under CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function) affecting MCPJam inspector, a local-first development platform for MCP servers. Versions 1.4.2 and earlier are vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) due to the lack of authentication on a function that installs an MCP server when triggered by a specially crafted HTTP request. The core issue stems from the default network binding of MCPJam inspector to 0.0.0.0, which exposes the service on all network interfaces rather than restricting it to localhost (127.0.0.1). This misconfiguration allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send a simple HTTP request that initiates the installation process of an MCP server, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the host system. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8, reflecting its critical impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with no privileges or user interaction required. Although no exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability's characteristics make it highly exploitable in exposed environments. The lack of authentication on a critical function combined with network exposure significantly increases the attack surface. MCPJam inspector is typically used in local development environments, but if deployed or accessible on broader networks, the risk escalates. The absence of a patch link suggests that a fix may not yet be publicly available, emphasizing the need for immediate mitigation through network controls or configuration changes.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a severe risk, especially those involved in software development or using MCPJam inspector as part of their development toolchain. The ability for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication can lead to full system compromise, data breaches, and disruption of development operations. Confidentiality is at risk as attackers could access sensitive source code or development data. Integrity is compromised since attackers can alter code or configurations, potentially introducing backdoors or malicious functionality. Availability is threatened by potential service disruptions or destruction of development environments. The vulnerability's ease of exploitation means attackers can quickly leverage it to gain footholds in networks. Organizations with exposed development environments or insufficient network segmentation are particularly vulnerable. This could also impact supply chain security if compromised development systems are used to build production software. The lack of known exploits in the wild provides a narrow window for proactive defense before active exploitation begins.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation steps include restricting MCPJam inspector's network binding to localhost (127.0.0.1) to prevent remote access. Network-level controls such as firewall rules should block external access to the ports used by MCPJam inspector. Organizations should monitor network traffic for unusual HTTP requests targeting MCPJam inspector endpoints. Until a vendor patch is released, consider isolating development environments using virtual LANs or VPNs with strict access controls. Conduct an inventory to identify all instances of MCPJam inspector and verify their version. Disable or uninstall MCPJam inspector on systems where it is not essential. Implement host-based intrusion detection to alert on suspicious process creation or network activity related to MCPJam inspector. Once a patch is available, prioritize timely deployment. Additionally, educate developers and IT staff about the risk and signs of exploitation. Regularly review and update security policies to ensure local development tools do not expose critical functions externally.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy
CVE-2026-23744: CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function in MCPJam inspector
Description
MCPJam inspector is the local-first development platform for MCP servers. Versions 1.4.2 and earlier are vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to send a crafted HTTP request that triggers the installation of an MCP server, leading to RCE. Since MCPJam inspector by default listens on 0.0.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1, an attacker can trigger the RCE remotely via a simple HTTP request. Version 1.4.3 contains a patch.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-23744 is a critical security vulnerability classified under CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function) affecting MCPJam inspector, a local-first development platform for MCP servers. Versions 1.4.2 and earlier are vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) due to the lack of authentication on a function that installs an MCP server when triggered by a specially crafted HTTP request. The core issue stems from the default network binding of MCPJam inspector to 0.0.0.0, which exposes the service on all network interfaces rather than restricting it to localhost (127.0.0.1). This misconfiguration allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send a simple HTTP request that initiates the installation process of an MCP server, resulting in arbitrary code execution on the host system. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8, reflecting its critical impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with no privileges or user interaction required. Although no exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability's characteristics make it highly exploitable in exposed environments. The lack of authentication on a critical function combined with network exposure significantly increases the attack surface. MCPJam inspector is typically used in local development environments, but if deployed or accessible on broader networks, the risk escalates. The absence of a patch link suggests that a fix may not yet be publicly available, emphasizing the need for immediate mitigation through network controls or configuration changes.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a severe risk, especially those involved in software development or using MCPJam inspector as part of their development toolchain. The ability for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication can lead to full system compromise, data breaches, and disruption of development operations. Confidentiality is at risk as attackers could access sensitive source code or development data. Integrity is compromised since attackers can alter code or configurations, potentially introducing backdoors or malicious functionality. Availability is threatened by potential service disruptions or destruction of development environments. The vulnerability's ease of exploitation means attackers can quickly leverage it to gain footholds in networks. Organizations with exposed development environments or insufficient network segmentation are particularly vulnerable. This could also impact supply chain security if compromised development systems are used to build production software. The lack of known exploits in the wild provides a narrow window for proactive defense before active exploitation begins.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation steps include restricting MCPJam inspector's network binding to localhost (127.0.0.1) to prevent remote access. Network-level controls such as firewall rules should block external access to the ports used by MCPJam inspector. Organizations should monitor network traffic for unusual HTTP requests targeting MCPJam inspector endpoints. Until a vendor patch is released, consider isolating development environments using virtual LANs or VPNs with strict access controls. Conduct an inventory to identify all instances of MCPJam inspector and verify their version. Disable or uninstall MCPJam inspector on systems where it is not essential. Implement host-based intrusion detection to alert on suspicious process creation or network activity related to MCPJam inspector. Once a patch is available, prioritize timely deployment. Additionally, educate developers and IT staff about the risk and signs of exploitation. Regularly review and update security policies to ensure local development tools do not expose critical functions externally.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-15T15:45:01.958Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 696a9dd0b22c7ad868e95256
Added to database: 1/16/2026, 8:21:36 PM
Last enriched: 1/16/2026, 8:35:56 PM
Last updated: 1/16/2026, 10:47:34 PM
Views: 4
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-5489
UnknownCVE-2025-5102
UnknownCVE-2024-8506
UnknownCVE-2024-8491
UnknownCVE-2026-23745: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in isaacs node-tar
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.