CVE-2026-24542: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in John James Jacoby WP Term Order
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John James Jacoby WP Term Order wp-term-order allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Term Order: from n/a through <= 2.1.0.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-24542 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Term Order plugin developed by John James Jacoby, specifically affecting versions up to and including 2.1.0. WP Term Order is a WordPress plugin that allows administrators to customize the order of taxonomy terms. The CSRF vulnerability arises because the plugin fails to properly verify the origin of requests that modify term order settings. This lack of verification enables an attacker to craft malicious web requests that, when visited by an authenticated WordPress user (typically an administrator or editor), can cause unintended changes to the term order configuration without the user's consent. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.3, indicating a medium severity level. The vector string (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) shows that the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges, but does require user interaction. The impact is limited to integrity, with no confidentiality or availability impact. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no patches have been officially released at the time of this report. The vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly to prevent potential misuse.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential unauthorized modification of taxonomy term orders within WordPress sites using the WP Term Order plugin. While this does not directly compromise sensitive data confidentiality or site availability, it can affect the integrity of website content presentation and navigation, potentially leading to user confusion, reputational damage, or indirect business impact. Organizations relying heavily on WordPress for content management, especially those with complex taxonomy structures or e-commerce sites, may experience operational disruptions or loss of trust if attackers manipulate term orders maliciously. Given that exploitation requires an authenticated user to interact with a malicious site, the risk is mitigated somewhat by user awareness and access controls. However, phishing or social engineering campaigns could increase the likelihood of exploitation. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits post-disclosure.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor for and apply official patches or updates from the WP Term Order plugin developer as soon as they become available. 2. Implement anti-CSRF tokens in all forms and requests that modify term order settings to ensure request authenticity. 3. Restrict administrative and editor access to trusted users only, minimizing the number of accounts that can be targeted for CSRF attacks. 4. Educate users with elevated privileges about the risks of clicking on suspicious links or visiting untrusted websites while logged into WordPress. 5. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting WordPress plugins. 6. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and remove or replace those that are outdated or no longer maintained. 7. Use security plugins that can detect unauthorized changes to taxonomy or content structures and alert administrators promptly.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
CVE-2026-24542: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in John James Jacoby WP Term Order
Description
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John James Jacoby WP Term Order wp-term-order allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Term Order: from n/a through <= 2.1.0.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-24542 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Term Order plugin developed by John James Jacoby, specifically affecting versions up to and including 2.1.0. WP Term Order is a WordPress plugin that allows administrators to customize the order of taxonomy terms. The CSRF vulnerability arises because the plugin fails to properly verify the origin of requests that modify term order settings. This lack of verification enables an attacker to craft malicious web requests that, when visited by an authenticated WordPress user (typically an administrator or editor), can cause unintended changes to the term order configuration without the user's consent. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.3, indicating a medium severity level. The vector string (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) shows that the attack can be performed remotely over the network with low attack complexity, requires no privileges, but does require user interaction. The impact is limited to integrity, with no confidentiality or availability impact. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no patches have been officially released at the time of this report. The vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly to prevent potential misuse.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential unauthorized modification of taxonomy term orders within WordPress sites using the WP Term Order plugin. While this does not directly compromise sensitive data confidentiality or site availability, it can affect the integrity of website content presentation and navigation, potentially leading to user confusion, reputational damage, or indirect business impact. Organizations relying heavily on WordPress for content management, especially those with complex taxonomy structures or e-commerce sites, may experience operational disruptions or loss of trust if attackers manipulate term orders maliciously. Given that exploitation requires an authenticated user to interact with a malicious site, the risk is mitigated somewhat by user awareness and access controls. However, phishing or social engineering campaigns could increase the likelihood of exploitation. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits post-disclosure.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor for and apply official patches or updates from the WP Term Order plugin developer as soon as they become available. 2. Implement anti-CSRF tokens in all forms and requests that modify term order settings to ensure request authenticity. 3. Restrict administrative and editor access to trusted users only, minimizing the number of accounts that can be targeted for CSRF attacks. 4. Educate users with elevated privileges about the risks of clicking on suspicious links or visiting untrusted websites while logged into WordPress. 5. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block CSRF attack patterns targeting WordPress plugins. 6. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and remove or replace those that are outdated or no longer maintained. 7. Use security plugins that can detect unauthorized changes to taxonomy or content structures and alert administrators promptly.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Patchstack
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-23T12:31:46.853Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69738ad94623b1157c48ba3b
Added to database: 1/23/2026, 2:51:05 PM
Last enriched: 1/31/2026, 8:31:10 AM
Last updated: 2/4/2026, 4:11:01 AM
Views: 55
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-1791: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in Hillstone Networks Operation and Maintenance Security Gateway
LowCVE-2026-1835: Cross-Site Request Forgery in lcg0124 BootDo
MediumCVE-2026-1813: Unrestricted Upload in bolo-blog bolo-solo
MediumCVE-2026-1632: CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function in RISS SRL MOMA Seismic Station
CriticalCVE-2026-1812: Path Traversal in bolo-blog bolo-solo
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.