Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-24850: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in RustCrypto signatures

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-24850cvecve-2026-24850cwe-347
Published: Wed Jan 28 2026 (01/28/2026, 00:24:53 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: RustCrypto
Product: signatures

Description

CVE-2026-24850 is a medium severity vulnerability in the RustCrypto ml-dsa crate, affecting versions from 0. 0. 4 up to but not including 0. 1. 0-rc. 4. The issue arises from improper verification of cryptographic signatures due to a regression bug where the signature verification logic incorrectly allows duplicate hint indices by using a non-strict monotonic check (<=) instead of a strict one (<). This violates the ML-DSA specification which requires strictly increasing hint indices, potentially allowing attackers to forge or bypass signature verification. No known exploits are reported in the wild. The vulnerability impacts the integrity of cryptographic operations but does not affect confidentiality or availability.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/28/2026, 01:05:48 UTC

Technical Analysis

The vulnerability CVE-2026-24850 affects the RustCrypto ml-dsa crate, a Rust implementation of the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard (ML-DSA), which is specified in FIPS 204 and RFC 9881. The flaw is a regression introduced in version 0.0.4 where the signature verification logic incorrectly accepts signatures containing duplicate hint indices within polynomials. According to the ML-DSA specification, hint indices must be strictly increasing, meaning each subsequent index must be greater than the previous one. However, the affected versions use a non-strict monotonic check (<=) rather than a strict (<) comparison, allowing repeated indices. This improper verification (CWE-347) undermines the integrity of the signature verification process, potentially enabling attackers to craft signatures that bypass verification or cause incorrect acceptance of invalid signatures. The original implementation was correct, but a code change introduced this regression. The vulnerability affects all versions from 0.0.4 up to but not including 0.1.0-rc.4, where the issue was corrected. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.3 (medium severity), reflecting that the vulnerability can be exploited remotely without authentication or user interaction, impacting integrity but not confidentiality or availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the flaw poses a risk to any system relying on this crate for cryptographic signature verification.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential compromise of cryptographic signature integrity. Systems relying on the affected versions of the RustCrypto ml-dsa crate for digital signatures may incorrectly validate forged or tampered signatures, leading to unauthorized code execution, bypass of security controls, or acceptance of malicious updates or communications. This can undermine trust in software supply chains, secure communications, and authentication mechanisms. Although confidentiality and availability are not directly impacted, the integrity breach can facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation or data manipulation. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on cryptographic assurance—such as finance, government, telecommunications, and critical infrastructure—are particularly at risk. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits given the public disclosure. Failure to update vulnerable systems could expose European entities to targeted attacks or supply chain compromises.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should promptly identify any usage of the RustCrypto ml-dsa crate within their software stacks, particularly versions >=0.0.4 and <0.1.0-rc.4. The primary mitigation is to upgrade to version 0.1.0-rc.4 or later, where the strict comparison bug is fixed. For organizations unable to upgrade immediately, code audits should be conducted to verify signature verification logic and ensure no acceptance of duplicate hint indices. Implement additional signature validation layers or fallback checks to detect anomalies in signature structures. Incorporate cryptographic agility practices to allow rapid replacement of vulnerable components. Monitor threat intelligence feeds for any emerging exploits targeting this vulnerability. For critical systems, consider isolating or restricting the use of affected components until patched. Finally, enforce secure software development lifecycle practices to detect and prevent similar regressions in cryptographic code.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2026-01-27T14:51:03.060Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69795d714623b1157c56bc0c

Added to database: 1/28/2026, 12:50:57 AM

Last enriched: 1/28/2026, 1:05:48 AM

Last updated: 1/28/2026, 1:51:36 AM

Views: 4

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats