CVE-2026-2544: OS Command Injection in yued-fe LuLu UI
A security flaw has been discovered in yued-fe LuLu UI up to 3.0.0. This issue affects the function child_process.exec of the file run.js. The manipulation results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-2544 is an OS command injection vulnerability identified in the yued-fe LuLu UI product, specifically affecting versions up to and including 3.0.0. The vulnerability exists in the run.js file, where the function child_process.exec is improperly secured, allowing untrusted input to be executed as operating system commands. This flaw enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the host system without requiring any authentication or user interaction, significantly increasing the attack surface. The vulnerability was responsibly disclosed to the vendor, but no response or patch has been provided to date. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges or user interaction needed (PR:N/UI:N), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability to a limited extent (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L). The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests it is not yet actively weaponized, but the ease of exploitation and potential impact make it a critical concern for affected deployments. The lack of vendor response and patch availability necessitates that organizations implement compensating controls to mitigate risk. The vulnerability's root cause is insufficient sanitization or validation of inputs passed to child_process.exec, a common source of command injection in Node.js applications.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for those relying on yued-fe LuLu UI in critical infrastructure, enterprise applications, or web-facing services. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized command execution, allowing attackers to compromise system confidentiality by accessing sensitive data, alter system integrity by modifying files or configurations, and disrupt availability through denial-of-service or destructive commands. This could result in data breaches, service outages, or lateral movement within networks. Given the remote exploitability without authentication, attackers can target exposed instances over the internet or internal networks. The medium CVSS score reflects a balanced risk, but the absence of patches and vendor engagement increases the urgency for European entities to act proactively. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and manufacturing that use this UI component may face regulatory and reputational consequences if exploited.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patch or vendor response is available, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Immediately restrict network exposure of LuLu UI instances by applying firewall rules or network segmentation to limit access to trusted IPs only. 2) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious command injection patterns targeting child_process.exec usage. 3) Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all inputs that interact with system commands, ideally by modifying the source code to avoid direct use of child_process.exec or by using safer alternatives like child_process.spawn with argument arrays. 4) Monitor system and application logs for unusual command execution or process spawning indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Implement host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to alert on anomalous OS command executions. 6) Prepare incident response plans specific to command injection attacks. 7) Engage with the vendor or community to track any future patches or advisories. 8) Consider isolating the affected application in containerized or sandboxed environments to limit impact if exploited.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2026-2544: OS Command Injection in yued-fe LuLu UI
Description
A security flaw has been discovered in yued-fe LuLu UI up to 3.0.0. This issue affects the function child_process.exec of the file run.js. The manipulation results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-2544 is an OS command injection vulnerability identified in the yued-fe LuLu UI product, specifically affecting versions up to and including 3.0.0. The vulnerability exists in the run.js file, where the function child_process.exec is improperly secured, allowing untrusted input to be executed as operating system commands. This flaw enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the host system without requiring any authentication or user interaction, significantly increasing the attack surface. The vulnerability was responsibly disclosed to the vendor, but no response or patch has been provided to date. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges or user interaction needed (PR:N/UI:N), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability to a limited extent (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L). The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests it is not yet actively weaponized, but the ease of exploitation and potential impact make it a critical concern for affected deployments. The lack of vendor response and patch availability necessitates that organizations implement compensating controls to mitigate risk. The vulnerability's root cause is insufficient sanitization or validation of inputs passed to child_process.exec, a common source of command injection in Node.js applications.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for those relying on yued-fe LuLu UI in critical infrastructure, enterprise applications, or web-facing services. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized command execution, allowing attackers to compromise system confidentiality by accessing sensitive data, alter system integrity by modifying files or configurations, and disrupt availability through denial-of-service or destructive commands. This could result in data breaches, service outages, or lateral movement within networks. Given the remote exploitability without authentication, attackers can target exposed instances over the internet or internal networks. The medium CVSS score reflects a balanced risk, but the absence of patches and vendor engagement increases the urgency for European entities to act proactively. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and manufacturing that use this UI component may face regulatory and reputational consequences if exploited.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patch or vendor response is available, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Immediately restrict network exposure of LuLu UI instances by applying firewall rules or network segmentation to limit access to trusted IPs only. 2) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious command injection patterns targeting child_process.exec usage. 3) Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all inputs that interact with system commands, ideally by modifying the source code to avoid direct use of child_process.exec or by using safer alternatives like child_process.spawn with argument arrays. 4) Monitor system and application logs for unusual command execution or process spawning indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Implement host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to alert on anomalous OS command executions. 6) Prepare incident response plans specific to command injection attacks. 7) Engage with the vendor or community to track any future patches or advisories. 8) Consider isolating the affected application in containerized or sandboxed environments to limit impact if exploited.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- VulDB
- Date Reserved
- 2026-02-15T15:54:20.415Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6992cbf7bda29fb02f561cf9
Added to database: 2/16/2026, 7:49:11 AM
Last enriched: 2/16/2026, 8:03:42 AM
Last updated: 2/21/2026, 12:19:43 AM
Views: 37
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-27203: CWE-15: External Control of System or Configuration Setting in YosefHayim ebay-mcp
HighCVE-2026-27168: CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in HappySeaFox sail
HighCVE-2026-27134: CWE-287: Improper Authentication in strimzi strimzi-kafka-operator
HighCVE-2026-27190: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in denoland deno
HighCVE-2026-27026: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in py-pdf pypdf
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.