Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-2544: OS Command Injection in yued-fe LuLu UI

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-2544cvecve-2026-2544
Published: Mon Feb 16 2026 (02/16/2026, 07:32:06 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: yued-fe
Product: LuLu UI

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in yued-fe LuLu UI up to 3.0.0. This issue affects the function child_process.exec of the file run.js. The manipulation results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 02/16/2026, 08:03:42 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-2544 is an OS command injection vulnerability identified in the yued-fe LuLu UI product, specifically affecting versions up to and including 3.0.0. The vulnerability exists in the run.js file, where the function child_process.exec is improperly secured, allowing untrusted input to be executed as operating system commands. This flaw enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the host system without requiring any authentication or user interaction, significantly increasing the attack surface. The vulnerability was responsibly disclosed to the vendor, but no response or patch has been provided to date. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges or user interaction needed (PR:N/UI:N), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability to a limited extent (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L). The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests it is not yet actively weaponized, but the ease of exploitation and potential impact make it a critical concern for affected deployments. The lack of vendor response and patch availability necessitates that organizations implement compensating controls to mitigate risk. The vulnerability's root cause is insufficient sanitization or validation of inputs passed to child_process.exec, a common source of command injection in Node.js applications.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for those relying on yued-fe LuLu UI in critical infrastructure, enterprise applications, or web-facing services. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized command execution, allowing attackers to compromise system confidentiality by accessing sensitive data, alter system integrity by modifying files or configurations, and disrupt availability through denial-of-service or destructive commands. This could result in data breaches, service outages, or lateral movement within networks. Given the remote exploitability without authentication, attackers can target exposed instances over the internet or internal networks. The medium CVSS score reflects a balanced risk, but the absence of patches and vendor engagement increases the urgency for European entities to act proactively. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and manufacturing that use this UI component may face regulatory and reputational consequences if exploited.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no official patch or vendor response is available, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Immediately restrict network exposure of LuLu UI instances by applying firewall rules or network segmentation to limit access to trusted IPs only. 2) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious command injection patterns targeting child_process.exec usage. 3) Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all inputs that interact with system commands, ideally by modifying the source code to avoid direct use of child_process.exec or by using safer alternatives like child_process.spawn with argument arrays. 4) Monitor system and application logs for unusual command execution or process spawning indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Implement host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to alert on anomalous OS command executions. 6) Prepare incident response plans specific to command injection attacks. 7) Engage with the vendor or community to track any future patches or advisories. 8) Consider isolating the affected application in containerized or sandboxed environments to limit impact if exploited.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
VulDB
Date Reserved
2026-02-15T15:54:20.415Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6992cbf7bda29fb02f561cf9

Added to database: 2/16/2026, 7:49:11 AM

Last enriched: 2/16/2026, 8:03:42 AM

Last updated: 2/21/2026, 12:19:43 AM

Views: 37

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats