CVE-2026-25961: sumatrapdfreader sumatrapdf · Improper Certificate Validation
Affects sumatrapdfreader sumatrapdfSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · public exploit available (Exploit-DB) · CVSS 7.5 High.
Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 37% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
t = 0 is the CVE’s publication on cve.org
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 9 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
Timeline
CVE ID reserved
by GitHub_M
, 4 hours before disclosure
CVE published
on cve.org
, t = 0
In Threat Radar
record ingested
, 12 minutes after disclosure
First Exploit-DB entry (opens in a new tab)
SumatraPDF 3.5.2 - Remote Code Execution
, 80 days after disclosure
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| sumatrapdfreadersumatrapdf | Affected
| Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
Immediate mitigation steps include disabling automatic updates in SumatraPDF versions 3.5.0 to 3.5.2 until a patched version is released. Organizations should implement network-level protections such as enforcing TLS inspection and certificate pinning where feasible to detect and block MITM attempts. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions should be configured to monitor for suspicious installer executions and anomalous network activity related to SumatraPDF update processes. Administrators should educate users to avoid manual update triggers from untrusted networks. Once available, promptly apply patches that restore proper TLS hostname verification and enforce digital signature checks on installers. Additionally, organizations should consider application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized executables from running and employ network segmentation to limit exposure of vulnerable endpoints. Regular audits of installed software versions and update mechanisms will help identify and remediate vulnerable instances.
Description
CVE-2026-25961 is a high-severity vulnerability in SumatraPDF versions 3.5.0 through 3.5.2 affecting its update mechanism. The flaw disables TLS hostname verification during update checks and executes installers without verifying their digital signatures. This allows a network attacker with any valid TLS certificate, including free certificates like Let's Encrypt, to intercept update requests and inject malicious installer URLs. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution on the victim's Windows system. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability due to the potential for full system compromise.