CVE-2026-26158: External Control of File Name or Path in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
A flaw was found in BusyBox. This vulnerability allows an attacker to modify files outside of the intended extraction directory by crafting a malicious tar archive containing unvalidated hardlink or symlink entries. If the tar archive is extracted with elevated privileges, this flaw can lead to privilege escalation, enabling an attacker to gain unauthorized access to critical system files.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-26158 is a vulnerability identified in BusyBox, a widely used software suite providing Unix utilities, including tar functionality, within Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The flaw arises from insufficient validation of hardlink and symlink entries in tar archives during extraction. An attacker can craft a malicious tar archive that includes these entries pointing outside the intended extraction directory. When such an archive is extracted, especially with elevated privileges (e.g., root), the extraction process can overwrite or create files in arbitrary locations on the filesystem. This external control of file name or path can lead to privilege escalation by allowing attackers to modify critical system files, potentially gaining unauthorized access or control over the system. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.0, reflecting high severity, with an attack vector requiring local access (AV:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), and requiring user interaction (UI:R). The impact affects confidentiality, integrity, and availability, as attackers can alter system files and potentially disrupt system operations. No known exploits are reported in the wild, but the risk remains significant due to the potential for privilege escalation and system compromise. The vulnerability affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, which still sees use in some legacy and specialized environments.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability allows attackers with local access to escalate privileges by exploiting the tar extraction process to overwrite or create files outside the intended directory. This can lead to unauthorized modification of critical system files, compromising system integrity and confidentiality. In worst cases, attackers can gain root-level access, enabling full control over affected systems. This can disrupt availability if system files are corrupted or replaced with malicious versions. Organizations running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 in production, especially those extracting untrusted tar archives with elevated privileges, face significant risk. The impact extends to critical infrastructure, enterprise servers, and legacy systems that rely on BusyBox tar functionality. Exploitation complexity is high, but the consequences of successful exploitation are severe, including potential data breaches, system downtime, and lateral movement within networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Apply official patches from Red Hat as soon as they become available to address this vulnerability in BusyBox. 2. Avoid extracting tar archives from untrusted or unauthenticated sources, especially with elevated privileges. 3. Use sandboxed or isolated environments for extracting untrusted archives to limit potential damage. 4. Employ file system permissions and access controls to restrict write access to critical directories during extraction. 5. Consider using alternative extraction tools that properly validate hardlink and symlink entries if patching is not immediately possible. 6. Implement monitoring and alerting for unusual file modifications in sensitive directories to detect potential exploitation attempts. 7. Educate system administrators and users about the risks of extracting untrusted archives with root privileges. 8. Regularly audit systems for unauthorized changes to critical files to identify potential compromise early.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, India, China, United Kingdom, Japan, France, Brazil, Russia, South Korea
CVE-2026-26158: External Control of File Name or Path in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Description
A flaw was found in BusyBox. This vulnerability allows an attacker to modify files outside of the intended extraction directory by crafting a malicious tar archive containing unvalidated hardlink or symlink entries. If the tar archive is extracted with elevated privileges, this flaw can lead to privilege escalation, enabling an attacker to gain unauthorized access to critical system files.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-26158 is a vulnerability identified in BusyBox, a widely used software suite providing Unix utilities, including tar functionality, within Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The flaw arises from insufficient validation of hardlink and symlink entries in tar archives during extraction. An attacker can craft a malicious tar archive that includes these entries pointing outside the intended extraction directory. When such an archive is extracted, especially with elevated privileges (e.g., root), the extraction process can overwrite or create files in arbitrary locations on the filesystem. This external control of file name or path can lead to privilege escalation by allowing attackers to modify critical system files, potentially gaining unauthorized access or control over the system. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.0, reflecting high severity, with an attack vector requiring local access (AV:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), and requiring user interaction (UI:R). The impact affects confidentiality, integrity, and availability, as attackers can alter system files and potentially disrupt system operations. No known exploits are reported in the wild, but the risk remains significant due to the potential for privilege escalation and system compromise. The vulnerability affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, which still sees use in some legacy and specialized environments.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability allows attackers with local access to escalate privileges by exploiting the tar extraction process to overwrite or create files outside the intended directory. This can lead to unauthorized modification of critical system files, compromising system integrity and confidentiality. In worst cases, attackers can gain root-level access, enabling full control over affected systems. This can disrupt availability if system files are corrupted or replaced with malicious versions. Organizations running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 in production, especially those extracting untrusted tar archives with elevated privileges, face significant risk. The impact extends to critical infrastructure, enterprise servers, and legacy systems that rely on BusyBox tar functionality. Exploitation complexity is high, but the consequences of successful exploitation are severe, including potential data breaches, system downtime, and lateral movement within networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Apply official patches from Red Hat as soon as they become available to address this vulnerability in BusyBox. 2. Avoid extracting tar archives from untrusted or unauthenticated sources, especially with elevated privileges. 3. Use sandboxed or isolated environments for extracting untrusted archives to limit potential damage. 4. Employ file system permissions and access controls to restrict write access to critical directories during extraction. 5. Consider using alternative extraction tools that properly validate hardlink and symlink entries if patching is not immediately possible. 6. Implement monitoring and alerting for unusual file modifications in sensitive directories to detect potential exploitation attempts. 7. Educate system administrators and users about the risks of extracting untrusted archives with root privileges. 8. Regularly audit systems for unauthorized changes to critical files to identify potential compromise early.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2026-02-11T17:05:41.991Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 698cea984b57a58fa1c97f4e
Added to database: 2/11/2026, 8:46:16 PM
Last enriched: 2/26/2026, 3:29:24 PM
Last updated: 3/29/2026, 12:53:42 AM
Views: 181
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.