CVE-2026-26158: External Control of File Name or Path in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
A flaw was found in BusyBox. This vulnerability allows an attacker to modify files outside of the intended extraction directory by crafting a malicious tar archive containing unvalidated hardlink or symlink entries. If the tar archive is extracted with elevated privileges, this flaw can lead to privilege escalation, enabling an attacker to gain unauthorized access to critical system files.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-26158 is a vulnerability identified in BusyBox, a widely used utility suite embedded in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The flaw arises from improper validation of hardlink and symlink entries within tar archives. An attacker can craft a malicious tar file containing these specially crafted entries that, when extracted, cause files outside the intended extraction directory to be overwritten or created. This behavior can be exploited if the extraction is performed with elevated privileges (e.g., root), allowing an attacker to escalate privileges by modifying critical system files or placing malicious files in sensitive locations. The vulnerability requires local access and user interaction to trigger the extraction process but does not require prior authentication. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.0, reflecting high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with attack vector local, attack complexity high, no privileges required, user interaction required, and unchanged scope. Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the potential for privilege escalation makes this a significant threat, especially in environments where legacy RHEL 6 systems are still operational. The lack of affected versions and patch links suggests that remediation may be pending or that users must monitor vendor advisories closely.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a serious risk, particularly for those maintaining legacy infrastructure on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized modification of critical system files, resulting in privilege escalation and potential full system compromise. This can disrupt operations, lead to data breaches, and undermine trust in IT systems. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure, which often rely on stable but older Linux distributions, are especially vulnerable. The need for local access and user interaction somewhat limits remote exploitation but insider threats or social engineering attacks could leverage this vulnerability. Additionally, the persistence of RHEL 6 in some environments due to long support cycles or delayed upgrades increases the attack surface. The high CVSS score indicates significant potential damage if exploited.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should prioritize upgrading from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 to supported versions where BusyBox vulnerabilities are patched. Until upgrades are feasible, administrators must avoid extracting tar archives from untrusted sources with elevated privileges. Implement strict file system permissions and use sandboxed environments for archive extraction to limit potential damage. Employ monitoring and alerting for unusual file system changes, especially in critical directories. Use security tools to scan tar files for malicious hardlink or symlink entries before extraction. Regularly review and enforce least privilege principles to minimize the impact of any successful exploitation. Stay informed on vendor advisories for patches or workarounds and apply them promptly once available. Consider deploying application whitelisting and integrity verification mechanisms to detect unauthorized file modifications.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-2026-26158: External Control of File Name or Path in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Description
A flaw was found in BusyBox. This vulnerability allows an attacker to modify files outside of the intended extraction directory by crafting a malicious tar archive containing unvalidated hardlink or symlink entries. If the tar archive is extracted with elevated privileges, this flaw can lead to privilege escalation, enabling an attacker to gain unauthorized access to critical system files.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-26158 is a vulnerability identified in BusyBox, a widely used utility suite embedded in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The flaw arises from improper validation of hardlink and symlink entries within tar archives. An attacker can craft a malicious tar file containing these specially crafted entries that, when extracted, cause files outside the intended extraction directory to be overwritten or created. This behavior can be exploited if the extraction is performed with elevated privileges (e.g., root), allowing an attacker to escalate privileges by modifying critical system files or placing malicious files in sensitive locations. The vulnerability requires local access and user interaction to trigger the extraction process but does not require prior authentication. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.0, reflecting high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with attack vector local, attack complexity high, no privileges required, user interaction required, and unchanged scope. Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the potential for privilege escalation makes this a significant threat, especially in environments where legacy RHEL 6 systems are still operational. The lack of affected versions and patch links suggests that remediation may be pending or that users must monitor vendor advisories closely.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a serious risk, particularly for those maintaining legacy infrastructure on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized modification of critical system files, resulting in privilege escalation and potential full system compromise. This can disrupt operations, lead to data breaches, and undermine trust in IT systems. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure, which often rely on stable but older Linux distributions, are especially vulnerable. The need for local access and user interaction somewhat limits remote exploitation but insider threats or social engineering attacks could leverage this vulnerability. Additionally, the persistence of RHEL 6 in some environments due to long support cycles or delayed upgrades increases the attack surface. The high CVSS score indicates significant potential damage if exploited.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should prioritize upgrading from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 to supported versions where BusyBox vulnerabilities are patched. Until upgrades are feasible, administrators must avoid extracting tar archives from untrusted sources with elevated privileges. Implement strict file system permissions and use sandboxed environments for archive extraction to limit potential damage. Employ monitoring and alerting for unusual file system changes, especially in critical directories. Use security tools to scan tar files for malicious hardlink or symlink entries before extraction. Regularly review and enforce least privilege principles to minimize the impact of any successful exploitation. Stay informed on vendor advisories for patches or workarounds and apply them promptly once available. Consider deploying application whitelisting and integrity verification mechanisms to detect unauthorized file modifications.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2026-02-11T17:05:41.991Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 698cea984b57a58fa1c97f4e
Added to database: 2/11/2026, 8:46:16 PM
Last enriched: 2/11/2026, 9:00:40 PM
Last updated: 2/11/2026, 9:57:28 PM
Views: 6
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-26031: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in frappe lms
LowCVE-2026-26029: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in akutishevsky sf-mcp-server
HighCVE-2024-50617: n/a
UnknownCVE-2026-26023: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in langgenius dify
MediumCVE-2026-26021: CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') in ahdinosaur set-in
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.