CVE-2026-26747VulnerabilityPublished 20 Feb 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-26747: n/a

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.1 Critical.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.1Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 38% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-26747, organizations should immediately review and update their Monica 4.1.2 configurations to explicitly set the app.force_url parameter to a fixed, trusted URL matching their legitimate domain. This prevents the application from relying on the user-supplied Host header when generating absolute URLs. Additionally, implement strict validation and sanitization of the Host header within the application code to reject or ignore unexpected or untrusted values. If possible, upgrade to a patched version of Monica once available from the vendor or community. In the interim, consider deploying web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block requests with suspicious Host headers. Educate users to verify URLs in password reset emails and report suspicious links. Monitor logs for anomalous Host header values and password reset requests. Finally, review email templates and delivery mechanisms to ensure URLs are generated securely and cannot be influenced by external input.

Description

A Host Header Poisoning vulnerability exists in Monica 4.1.2 due to improper handling of the HTTP Host header in app/Providers/AppServiceProvider.php, combined with the default misconfiguration where the "app.force_url" is not set and default is "false". The application generates absolute URLs (such as those used in password reset emails) using the user-supplied Host header. This allows remote attackers to poison the password reset link sent to a victim,

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-26747 is on the confidentiality and integrity of user accounts within Monica 4.1.2 deployments. By poisoning password reset links, attackers can redirect users to malicious sites designed to harvest credentials or deliver malware, facilitating account takeover and broader compromise. This undermines user trust and can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive personal or organizational data managed within Monica. Since password reset functionality is critical for account recovery, exploitation can disrupt normal user operations and increase support costs. The vulnerability does not affect system availability directly but can have cascading effects through compromised accounts. Organizations relying on Monica for contact and relationship management, especially those handling sensitive or regulated data, face reputational damage and potential compliance violations if exploited. The ease of exploitation without authentication or user interaction further elevates the threat, making automated or mass phishing campaigns feasible. Although no known exploits exist yet, the high CVSS score and straightforward attack vector suggest imminent risk if unmitigated.

CWE-644Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes web scripting syntax in HTTP headers that can be used by web browser components that can process raw headers, such as Flash.
Architecture and Design
Perform output validation in order to filter/escape/encode unsafe data that is being passed from the server in an HTTP response header.
Architecture and Design
Disable script execution functionality in the clients' browser.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Content Security Policy (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention in Java (opens in a new tab)
Query Parameterization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V14.4.6 (opens in a new tab)
V14.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 28 Feb 2026, 13:19 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-644

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats