VulnerabilityPublished 21 Feb 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-2895: funadmin · Weak Password Recovery

Affects funadminSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 6.3 Medium.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026, 19:04 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 39% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: The successful attack depends on the evasion or circumvention of security-enhancing techniques in place that would otherwise hinder the attack. These include: Evasion of exploit mitigation techniques, for example, circumvention of address space randomization (ASLR) or data execution prevention (DEP) must be performed for the attack to be successful; Obtaining target-specific secrets. The attacker must gather some target-specific secret before the attack can be successful. A secret is any piece of information that cannot be obtained through any amount of reconnaissance. To obtain the secret the attacker must perform additional attacks or break otherwise secure measures (e.g. knowledge of a secret key may be needed to break a crypto channel). This operation must be performed for each attacked target.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 21 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
funadmin	Affected 7.1.0-rc1 – 7.1.0-rc4 4 affected builds	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:funadmin:funadmin:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-2895, organizations should first identify and inventory all funadmin instances running affected versions (7.1.0-rc1 through 7.1.0-rc4). 2) Implement additional verification steps for password resets, such as multi-factor authentication or out-of-band confirmation, to compensate for the weak verification in the vulnerable function. 3) Monitor logs for unusual password reset attempts or repeated manipulation of forget_code/vercode parameters. 4) Restrict access to the password recovery endpoint via network controls or web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting suspicious parameter manipulation. 5) Educate users to report unexpected password reset notifications promptly. 6) Plan for upgrading funadmin to a future patched version once available or consider alternative CMS solutions if immediate patching is not feasible. 7) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on authentication and password recovery mechanisms to detect similar weaknesses.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in funadmin up to 7.1.0-rc4. Affected by this issue is the function repass of the file app/frontend/controller/Member.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument forget_code/vercode results in weak password recovery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-2895 is unauthorized account takeover through exploitation of the weak password recovery process. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to reset passwords of legitimate users, potentially gaining access to sensitive data or administrative functions depending on the compromised accounts. This threatens confidentiality and integrity of user data and system operations. Although the attack complexity is high, the lack of authentication and user interaction requirements means attackers can attempt exploitation remotely without user involvement. Organizations with exposed funadmin installations risk unauthorized access, data breaches, and potential further compromise if attackers escalate privileges post-account takeover. The absence of vendor response and patches increases exposure duration, raising the likelihood of exploitation attempts over time. However, the medium severity and high complexity somewhat limit immediate widespread impact.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…