VulnerabilityPublished 20 Mar 2026Updated 23 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-32663: IGL-Technologies eParking.fi · CWE-613

Affects IGL-Technologies eParking.fiSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.3 High.

Data as of 1 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.3High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 17% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 1 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IGL-TechnologieseParking.fi	Affected =All versions	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Until an official patch is released, organizations should implement network-level controls such as Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) to detect and block anomalous WebSocket session behaviors, including multiple connections using the same session ID. Rate limiting and connection throttling can help mitigate denial-of-service attempts by limiting the number of simultaneous session requests from a single source. Monitoring and logging WebSocket session activity for unusual patterns can provide early detection of exploitation attempts. Segmentation of the charging station network from other critical infrastructure reduces the blast radius of potential attacks. Implementing additional authentication or token-based session validation mechanisms at the application layer can help prevent unauthorized session reuse. Organizations should engage with IGL-Technologies for updates and patches and plan for timely deployment once available. Conducting security assessments and penetration testing focused on WebSocket session management is recommended to identify and remediate related weaknesses.

Description

The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests.

Impact

The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access to charging station sessions, allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate devices and intercept or manipulate commands. This compromises the confidentiality and integrity of communications between charging stations and backend systems. The session shadowing attack can disrupt normal operations by displacing legitimate connections, potentially causing operational failures or incorrect billing. Furthermore, the ability to overwhelm the backend with valid session requests can result in denial-of-service conditions, affecting availability and potentially causing widespread service outages. For organizations managing large fleets of electric vehicle charging stations, this could translate into significant operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage. The lack of authentication and user interaction requirements lowers the barrier to exploitation, increasing the likelihood of attacks. Critical infrastructure providers and smart city deployments using eParking.fi are particularly vulnerable, as disruption could impact public services and EV users at scale.

CWE-613DEPRECATED: Insufficient Session Expiration (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
This entry has been deprecated because it was insufficiently clear. Consider CWE-1462 and its descendants.
MITRE does not allow mapping vulnerabilities to this entry; it groups weaknesses rather than naming one.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.8.1 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.6 (opens in a new tab)
V3.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 28 Mar 2026, 21:44 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-613

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats