Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-32694: Canonical Juju · Predictable Value Range From Previous Values

Affects Canonical JujuSource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.6 Medium : upgrade to 3.6.19 when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 20:25 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
6.6Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 3.6.19
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 18 Mar 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade Juju and juju to 3.6.19.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
CanonicalJujuAffected
  • >=3.0.0 <3.6.19
Fixed in
  • 3.6.19
GitHubjuju/jujupkg:github/juju/jujuOther threatsAffected
  • =3.0.0
Fixed in–
GitHubjujupkg:github/jujuOther threatsAffected
  • >=3.0.0 <3.6.19
Fixed in
  • 3.6.19

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Organizations should upgrade Juju to versions later than 3.6.18 where this vulnerability is addressed. Until patches are available or applied, administrators should avoid deploying configurations where multiple applications are managed with shared secret owners, especially if one application is controlled by an untrusted party. Implement strict access controls and monitoring on secret requests and usage. Consider segregating secret owners per application or tenant to reduce the risk of cross-application secret inference. Review and enhance secret generation and verification mechanisms to avoid predictable identifiers. Employ network segmentation and least privilege principles to limit the impact of compromised grantees. Regularly audit secret access logs for anomalous patterns indicative of exploitation attempts.

Description

In Juju from version 3.0.0 through 3.6.18, when a secret owner grants permissions to a secret to a grantee, the secret owner relies exclusively on a predictable XID of the secret to verify ownership. This allows a malicious grantee which can request secrets to predict past secrets granted by the same secret owner to different grantees, allowing them to use the resources granted by those past secrets. Successful exploitation relies on a very specific configuration, specific data semantic, and the administrator having the need to deploy at least two different applications, one of them controlled by the attacker.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…