CVE-2026-32694: CWE-343 Predictable value range from previous values in Canonical Juju
In Juju from version 3.0.0 through 3.6.18, when a secret owner grants permissions to a secret to a grantee, the secret owner relies exclusively on a predictable XID of the secret to verify ownership. This allows a malicious grantee which can request secrets to predict past secrets granted by the same secret owner to different grantees, allowing them to use the resources granted by those past secrets. Successful exploitation relies on a very specific configuration, specific data semantic, and the administrator having the need to deploy at least two different applications, one of them controlled by the attacker.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-32694 affects Canonical's Juju orchestration tool from versions 3.0.0 through 3.6.18. The vulnerability stems from the secret ownership verification mechanism relying exclusively on a predictable secret XID (an identifier). When a secret owner grants permissions to a secret to a grantee, the grantee can predict the XIDs of past secrets granted by the same owner to other grantees. This predictability allows a malicious grantee, who can request secrets and controls at least one deployed application, to infer and access secrets not intended for them. The flaw is categorized under CWE-343 (Predictable Value) and CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key). Exploitation requires a very specific environment: the administrator must deploy at least two different applications, one controlled by the attacker, and the attacker must have elevated privileges (PR:H) but no user interaction is needed. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability of secrets and resources dependent on them. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the predictable XID mechanism represents a significant design weakness in secret management within Juju. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.6, indicating medium severity, with network attack vector, high attack complexity, and high privileges required.
Potential Impact
If exploited, this vulnerability allows a malicious grantee with elevated privileges to access secrets that were granted to other grantees by the same secret owner, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive credentials, configuration data, or other protected resources. This compromises confidentiality and integrity of secrets and can disrupt availability if critical resources are manipulated or revoked. In multi-tenant or multi-application Juju deployments, attackers could leverage this to escalate privileges or move laterally across applications and services. The impact is particularly severe in environments where secrets control access to critical infrastructure or cloud resources. Although exploitation requires specific conditions, the potential for unauthorized access to multiple secrets makes this a significant risk for organizations relying on Juju for orchestration and secret management.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should upgrade Juju to versions later than 3.6.18 where this vulnerability is addressed. Until patches are available or applied, administrators should avoid deploying configurations where multiple applications are managed with shared secret owners, especially if one application is controlled by an untrusted party. Implement strict access controls and monitoring on secret requests and usage. Consider segregating secret owners per application or tenant to reduce the risk of cross-application secret inference. Review and enhance secret generation and verification mechanisms to avoid predictable identifiers. Employ network segmentation and least privilege principles to limit the impact of compromised grantees. Regularly audit secret access logs for anomalous patterns indicative of exploitation attempts.
Affected Countries
United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada, Japan, Australia, Netherlands, India, South Korea
CVE-2026-32694: CWE-343 Predictable value range from previous values in Canonical Juju
Description
In Juju from version 3.0.0 through 3.6.18, when a secret owner grants permissions to a secret to a grantee, the secret owner relies exclusively on a predictable XID of the secret to verify ownership. This allows a malicious grantee which can request secrets to predict past secrets granted by the same secret owner to different grantees, allowing them to use the resources granted by those past secrets. Successful exploitation relies on a very specific configuration, specific data semantic, and the administrator having the need to deploy at least two different applications, one of them controlled by the attacker.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-32694 affects Canonical's Juju orchestration tool from versions 3.0.0 through 3.6.18. The vulnerability stems from the secret ownership verification mechanism relying exclusively on a predictable secret XID (an identifier). When a secret owner grants permissions to a secret to a grantee, the grantee can predict the XIDs of past secrets granted by the same owner to other grantees. This predictability allows a malicious grantee, who can request secrets and controls at least one deployed application, to infer and access secrets not intended for them. The flaw is categorized under CWE-343 (Predictable Value) and CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key). Exploitation requires a very specific environment: the administrator must deploy at least two different applications, one controlled by the attacker, and the attacker must have elevated privileges (PR:H) but no user interaction is needed. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability of secrets and resources dependent on them. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the predictable XID mechanism represents a significant design weakness in secret management within Juju. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.6, indicating medium severity, with network attack vector, high attack complexity, and high privileges required.
Potential Impact
If exploited, this vulnerability allows a malicious grantee with elevated privileges to access secrets that were granted to other grantees by the same secret owner, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive credentials, configuration data, or other protected resources. This compromises confidentiality and integrity of secrets and can disrupt availability if critical resources are manipulated or revoked. In multi-tenant or multi-application Juju deployments, attackers could leverage this to escalate privileges or move laterally across applications and services. The impact is particularly severe in environments where secrets control access to critical infrastructure or cloud resources. Although exploitation requires specific conditions, the potential for unauthorized access to multiple secrets makes this a significant risk for organizations relying on Juju for orchestration and secret management.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should upgrade Juju to versions later than 3.6.18 where this vulnerability is addressed. Until patches are available or applied, administrators should avoid deploying configurations where multiple applications are managed with shared secret owners, especially if one application is controlled by an untrusted party. Implement strict access controls and monitoring on secret requests and usage. Consider segregating secret owners per application or tenant to reduce the risk of cross-application secret inference. Review and enhance secret generation and verification mechanisms to avoid predictable identifiers. Employ network segmentation and least privilege principles to limit the impact of compromised grantees. Regularly audit secret access logs for anomalous patterns indicative of exploitation attempts.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- canonical
- Date Reserved
- 2026-03-13T12:53:34.544Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69baabfa771bdb1749a00bde
Added to database: 3/18/2026, 1:43:22 PM
Last enriched: 3/18/2026, 1:57:54 PM
Last updated: 3/19/2026, 6:57:12 AM
Views: 10
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.