Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-3683: Server-Side Request Forgery in bufanyun HotGo

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-3683cvecve-2026-3683
Published: Sat Mar 07 2026 (03/07/2026, 23:32:10 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: bufanyun
Product: HotGo

Description

A vulnerability was detected in bufanyun HotGo up to 2.0. This issue affects the function ImageTransferStorage of the file /server/internal/logic/common/upload.go of the component Endpoint. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 03/08/2026, 00:00:26 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-3683 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the bufanyun HotGo product up to version 2.0. The flaw resides in the ImageTransferStorage function located in the /server/internal/logic/common/upload.go source file, part of the Endpoint component. SSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker can manipulate a server to send crafted requests to unintended locations, potentially accessing internal services or sensitive data not directly exposed to the attacker. In this case, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to exploit the server’s request handling logic without requiring user interaction, but with low privileges (PR:L). The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and partial impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (VC:L, VI:L, VA:L). The exploit is publicly available, increasing the risk of exploitation despite no known active attacks in the wild. The vendor was contacted but did not respond or provide a patch, leaving users exposed. This vulnerability could be leveraged to perform internal network scanning, access internal APIs, or exfiltrate data by abusing the server’s trust boundaries. Given the lack of vendor response and patch, organizations must implement compensating controls to mitigate risk.

Potential Impact

The SSRF vulnerability in HotGo 2.0 can have several impacts on affected organizations. Attackers could use the vulnerability to access internal network resources that are otherwise inaccessible, potentially leading to information disclosure or further exploitation of internal systems. This could compromise confidentiality by exposing sensitive internal endpoints or data. Integrity and availability impacts are possible if attackers leverage SSRF to interact with internal services in a way that disrupts operations or modifies data. The medium CVSS score reflects that while the vulnerability is exploitable remotely without user interaction, it requires some level of privilege and has limited direct impact on system integrity or availability. However, the potential for lateral movement and reconnaissance within internal networks makes it a significant risk. Organizations relying on HotGo 2.0, especially in sensitive environments, could face data breaches, unauthorized access, or service disruptions if exploited.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no official patch or update is available from the vendor, organizations should apply the following specific mitigations: 1) Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to limit the server’s ability to make outbound requests to internal or sensitive network segments. 2) Use web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious SSRF payloads targeting the ImageTransferStorage endpoint. 3) Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on any user-supplied URLs or parameters used by the ImageTransferStorage function to prevent malicious request redirection. 4) Monitor logs for unusual outbound requests originating from the HotGo server, especially to internal IP ranges or unexpected external domains. 5) Restrict the privileges of the HotGo service account to minimize the impact of exploitation. 6) Consider deploying network-level egress filtering to prevent unauthorized external requests. 7) If feasible, isolate the HotGo server in a controlled environment with limited network access until a patch is available. 8) Engage in active threat hunting for indicators of compromise related to SSRF exploitation attempts. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on network controls, monitoring, and application-level input validation specific to the vulnerable component.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
VulDB
Date Reserved
2026-03-06T21:32:05.408Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69acb8bfc48b3f10ffdd173d

Added to database: 3/7/2026, 11:46:07 PM

Last enriched: 3/8/2026, 12:00:26 AM

Last updated: 3/8/2026, 2:05:48 AM

Views: 9

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses