VulnerabilityPublished 8 Mar 2026Updated 11 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-3720: 1024-lab SmartAdmin · Cross-site Scripting

Affects 1024-lab SmartAdminSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 13% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
1024-labSmartAdmin	Affected 3.0 – 3.29 30 affected builds	Fixed in–
lab1024SmartAdmin	Affected 3.0 – 3.29 30 affected builds	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of official patches, organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. First, apply strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data within the Notice Module if source code access and modification are possible. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers accessing the SmartAdmin interface. Use web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block typical XSS payloads targeting the vulnerable component. Educate users to recognize and avoid suspicious links or inputs that could trigger XSS attacks. Limit user privileges to the minimum necessary to reduce the impact of potential session hijacking. Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual activity indicative of exploitation attempts. Consider isolating or restricting access to the affected SmartAdmin modules until a vendor patch or official fix is released. Regularly check for vendor updates or community patches addressing this vulnerability.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in 1024-lab/lab1024 SmartAdmin up to 3.29. Impacted is an unknown function of the file smart-admin-web-javascript/src/views/business/oa/notice/components/notice-form-drawer.vue of the component Notice Module. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-3720 is the potential for attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of users interacting with the vulnerable SmartAdmin Notice Module. This can lead to theft of session tokens, user credentials, or other sensitive information accessible via the browser, enabling further attacks such as session hijacking or privilege escalation. The integrity of displayed data can be compromised by injecting misleading or malicious content. Although the attack requires user interaction, the remote exploitability and public availability of exploit code increase the risk of targeted phishing or social engineering campaigns. Organizations relying on SmartAdmin for business operations may face reputational damage, data leakage, and potential compliance violations if exploited. The lack of vendor response and patches prolongs exposure, increasing the window for attackers to exploit this vulnerability. However, the absence of known active exploitation campaigns suggests limited current impact but does not preclude future attacks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 15 Mar 2026, 09:07 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats