VulnerabilityPublished 11 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-3825: WellChoose IFTOP · Cross-site Scripting

Affects WellChoose IFTOPSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium : upgrade to IFTOP_P4_181 when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 17% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in IFTOP_P4_181

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Active
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: Low
Subsequent system integrity: Low
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Active: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a targeted user to perform specific, conscious interactions with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload, or the user’s interactions would actively subvert protection mechanisms which would lead to exploitation of the vulnerability.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Subsequent System.
Subsequent system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Subsequent System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade WellChoose IFTOP to IFTOP_P4_181.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
WellChooseIFTOP	Affected =0	Fixed in IFTOP_P4_181

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-3825, organizations should promptly update WellChoose IFTOP to version IFTOP_P4_181 or later as recommended by the vendor. Beyond patching, implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data within the web interface to prevent injection of malicious scripts. Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers. Limit access to the IFTOP web interface by network segmentation and firewall rules to reduce exposure to untrusted users. Educate users about the risks of clicking unknown links or visiting untrusted sites while logged into the IFTOP interface. Regularly audit and monitor web interface logs for suspicious activity indicative of attempted XSS exploitation. Consider using web application firewalls (WAFs) that can detect and block XSS payloads targeting the interface. These combined measures will reduce the attack surface and improve resilience against exploitation.

Description

IFTOP developed by WellChoose has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript codes in user's browser through phishing attacks.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-3825 is on the confidentiality and integrity of user sessions interacting with the IFTOP web interface. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary scripts in the victim's browser, potentially leading to session hijacking, theft of sensitive information, or unauthorized actions performed on behalf of the user. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise server availability or integrity, the client-side impact can lead to broader security breaches if attackers leverage stolen credentials or session tokens. Organizations relying on IFTOP for network monitoring or management may face operational risks if attackers gain unauthorized access through this vector. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the ease of exploitation and network accessibility make timely remediation critical to prevent future attacks.

Summary

CVE-2026-3825 is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability classified under CWE-79, affecting the WellChoose IFTOP product. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of user-supplied input during the generation of web pages, which allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into the web interface. This flaw can be exploited remotely without requiring any authentication or privileges, but it does require user interaction, such as clicking a crafted link or visiting a malicious page that triggers the injected script. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates the attack vector is network-based (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction required for the attack itself (UI:A), and low scope impact (S:L). The impact is limited to client-side confidentiality, integrity, and availability, as the vulnerability does not affect server-side components directly. The vendor has advised updating to version IFTOP_P4_181 or later to fix the issue. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability poses a risk of session hijacking, credential theft, or other malicious actions executed in the context of the victim's browser. The vulnerability is particularly relevant for organizations using IFTOP in environments where web-based management interfaces are exposed or accessible to untrusted users.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (Cross-site Scripting) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Mar 2026, 07:14 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats