Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-58188: Apache Traffic Server · Out-of-bounds Write

Affects Apache Traffic ServerSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.2 High · fixed in 9.2.15 : patch Apache Traffic Server soon.

Data as of 28 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
8.2High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 55% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 9.2.15
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 29 Jul 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Apache Software FoundationApache Traffic ServerAffected
  • >=8.0.0 <=8.1.11
  • >=9.0.0 <=9.2.14
  • >=10.0.0 <=10.1.3
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Users should upgrade Apache Traffic Server to versions 9.2.15 or 10.1.4, which contain fixes for this vulnerability. Patch status is confirmed by the vendor advisory recommending these versions. No other mitigation steps are indicated.

Description

Several Apache Traffic Server experimental plugins have memory-safety and limit-bypass errors. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 8.1.11, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.14, from 10.0.0 through 10.1.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.2.15 or 10.1.4, which fix the issue.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…