Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-64322: Linux kernel · Out-of-bounds Write

Affects Linux kernelSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High · fixed in eeb0f3e193f8e523d03e4c9e084f6b4875f50e8e : patch Linux kernel soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.8High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 6% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CISA SSVC
Exploitation
No evidence of active exploitation and no public proof of concept
Automatable
Attackers cannot reliably automate steps 1–4 of the kill chain
Technical impact
Total control over the software or total information disclosure

CISA SSVC assessment, 2026-10-16.

Patch
Available – fixed in eeb0f3e193f8e523d03e4c9e084f6b4875f50e8e, 7285276aa50d2839afb5957ffd491ad282dc8f72, 7f7774b9da0ef17b87bfa238cf966ad0b3376150 +10
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 25 Jul 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • >=2.6.32.60 <2.6.33
  • >=2.6.34.14 <2.6.35
  • >=3.0.37 <3.1
  • >=3.2.23 <3.3
  • >=3.4.5 <3.5
Fixed in
  • eeb0f3e193f8e523d03e4c9e084f6b4875f50e8e
  • 7285276aa50d2839afb5957ffd491ad282dc8f72
  • 7f7774b9da0ef17b87bfa238cf966ad0b3376150
  • 04f4599a9efb90992d072a814960edf0cd62805d
  • 3ec997bd5508e9b25210b5bbec89031629cdb093
  • 3.5
  • 3.3
  • 3.1
  • 2d726135099313958f8975532a2e15322ff150ce
  • 2a219acb2ce674d99bbd1b7b35ed8c384dac7200
  • 2.6.35
  • 2.6.33
  • 0a9b79a951cfd70a9d31ca01ae2d08a20bb730e9
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • =3.5
Fixed in–

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udf: validate sparing table length as an entry count, not a byte count udf_load_sparable_map() accepts a sparing table when sizeof(*st) + le16_to_cpu(st->reallocationTableLen) > sb->s_blocksize is false, i.e. it treats reallocationTableLen as a number of BYTES that must fit in the block. But the table is walked as an array of 8-byte sparingEntry elements: for (i = 0; i < le16_to_cpu(st->reallocationTableLen); i++) { struct sparingEntry *entry = &st->mapEntry[i]; ... entry->origLocation ... } in udf_get_pblock_spar15() and udf_relocate_blocks(). A reallocationTableLen of N therefore passes the check whenever sizeof(*st) + N <= blocksize, yet the consumers index sizeof(*st) + N * sizeof(struct sparingEntry) bytes -- up to ~8x the block. On a crafted UDF image this is an out-of-bounds read in udf_get_pblock_spar15(); udf_relocate_blocks() additionally feeds the same length to udf_update_tag(), whose crc_itu_t() reads far past the block, and its memmove() through st->mapEntry[] is an out-of-bounds write. Validate reallocationTableLen as the entry count it is, with struct_size().

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…