Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-72375: Linux kernel · afs: Fix reinitialisation of the inode, in particular ->lock_work

Affects Linux kernelSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High · fixed in ebfd13c0367adb43d7c0a72f5cd7e004e60c6b28 : patch Linux kernel soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.8High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 6% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CISA SSVC
Exploitation
No evidence of active exploitation and no public proof of concept
Automatable
Attackers cannot reliably automate steps 1–4 of the kill chain
Technical impact
Total control over the software or total information disclosure

CISA SSVC assessment, 2026-10-16.

Patch
Available – fixed in ebfd13c0367adb43d7c0a72f5cd7e004e60c6b28, 5597fbd1e7c161914f20315a726e54025b0fdadb, 63d3f283858fae097fb09ddd4ce46bb0bc1f9d01 +2
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 15 Aug 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e8d6c554126b830217c5e9f549e0e21f865a0a8a, < ebfd13c0367adb43d7c0a72f5cd7e004e60c6b28
Fixed in
  • ebfd13c0367adb43d7c0a72f5cd7e004e60c6b28
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e8d6c554126b830217c5e9f549e0e21f865a0a8a, < 5597fbd1e7c161914f20315a726e54025b0fdadb
Fixed in
  • 5597fbd1e7c161914f20315a726e54025b0fdadb
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e8d6c554126b830217c5e9f549e0e21f865a0a8a, < 63d3f283858fae097fb09ddd4ce46bb0bc1f9d01
Fixed in
  • 63d3f283858fae097fb09ddd4ce46bb0bc1f9d01
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e8d6c554126b830217c5e9f549e0e21f865a0a8a, < 34dff35154e2fb3987ec5e0b40def14c64eadeb1
Fixed in
  • 34dff35154e2fb3987ec5e0b40def14c64eadeb1
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e8d6c554126b830217c5e9f549e0e21f865a0a8a, < 2e7888bb635d9bc84359491347b236cc232ca4df
Fixed in
  • 2e7888bb635d9bc84359491347b236cc232ca4df
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • =2.6.23
Fixed in–

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix reinitialisation of the inode, in particular ->lock_work It seems that initalising afs_vnode::lock_work a single time in the slab's init function isn't sufficient for work_structs. This results in the DEBUG_OBJECTS debugging stuff producing a warning occasionally when running the generic/131 xfstest: ODEBUG: activate not available (active state 0) object: 0000000016d8760f object type: work_struct hint: afs_lock_work+0x0/0x220 WARNING: lib/debugobjects.c:629 at debug_print_object+0x4b/0x90, CPU#3: locktest/7695 ... CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 7695 Comm: locktest Tainted: G S 7.1.0-build3+ #2771 PREEMPT ... RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x65/0x90 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __pfx_afs_lock_work+0x10/0x10 debug_object_activate+0x122/0x170 insert_work+0x25/0x60 __queue_work+0x2e0/0x340 queue_delayed_work_on+0x48/0x70 afs_fl_release_private+0x57/0x70 locks_release_private+0x5c/0xa0 locks_free_lock+0xe/0x20 posix_lock_inode+0x55f/0x5b0 locks_lock_inode_wait+0x81/0x140 ? file_write_and_wait_range+0x50/0x70 afs_lock+0xcd/0x110 fcntl_setlk+0x10d/0x260 do_fcntl+0x24e/0x5b0 __do_sys_fcntl+0x6a/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x11e/0x310 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x71/0x79 Fix this by reinitialising ->lock_work after allocating an inode. Also, flush ->lock_work when the inode is being evicted to make sure it's not still running.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…