CVE-2026-78425: SUSE github.com/neuvector/neuvector · Improper Authentication
Affects SUSE github.com/neuvector/neuvectorSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.6 High : upgrade to 5.6.2 soon.
Data as of 1 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 30% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
- Patch
- Available – fixed in 5.6.2
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 1 Nov 2026.
What to do
Upgrade SUSE github.com/neuvector/neuvector to 5.6.2.
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| SUSEgithub.com/neuvector/neuvector | Affected
| Fixed in
|
Gogithub.com/neuvector/neuvectorpkg:golang/github.com/neuvector/neuvectorOther threats | Affected
| Fixed in
|
Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.
AI-suggested
If you cannot patch yet, organizations should consider restricting SAML assertion reuse or implementing additional access controls around NeuVector authentication. Monitoring for unusual authentication patterns involving SAML assertions may help detect exploitation attempts.
Description
Authorised users of outside applications behind the same corporate identity provider (IdP), for example, a wiki, a ticketing system, an expenses tool, or anything they legitimately hold an account on can log into their system via SAML SSO. The IdP issues an assertion to them. If that assertion is presented to NeuVector, NeuVector accepts it because the only thing distinguishing "an assertion for NeuVector" from "an assertion for the wiki" is the element, and the `NotInAudience` warning that reports the mismatch is never read.