VulnerabilityPublished 7 Oct 2026Updated 26 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-106110: ImageSharp · TIFF CCITT T4 encoder can write past its compressed output buffer

Affects SixLabors.ImageSharpSource GCVE Database

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-106110· High 7.5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High : upgrade to 3.2.0 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 32% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 3.2.0, 4.1.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 6 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade SixLabors.ImageSharp to 3.2.0; SixLabors.ImageSharp to 4.1.2.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp	Affected >=2.0.0 <3.2.0	Fixed in 3.2.0
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp	Affected >=4.0.0 <4.1.2	Fixed in 4.1.2

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary ImageSharp's TIFF CCITT Group 3 (T4) encoder can write beyond its allocated compressed-data buffer when encoding narrow 1-bit images. The unchecked writes can corrupt process memory and terminate the process. This report concerns only the T4 `CcittGroup3Fax` encoder path. It replaces the prior, unrelated ICC content. ### Affected package and versions - Package: `SixLabors.ImageSharp` (NuGet) - Affected range: `>= 2.0.0, <= 4.1.1` - Commit `0815358f9202a78bc7f3b83e19282dc3654b500f` corresponds to release **v4.1.1**. The T4 encoder and its undersized buffer calculation first shipped in v2.0.0. The narrow-image exploit terminates published v2.0.0 and v4.1.1 while the same-height 64-pixel control succeeds on both. Every release through v4.1.1 retains the vulnerable allocation and unchecked bit-write structure. ### Preconditions and impact The affected path is reached when the application encodes 1-bit image data with `TiffCompression.CcittGroup3Fax`. This can happen when an application explicitly selects `TiffEncoder.BitsPerPixel = Bit1` and `TiffEncoder.Compression = CcittGroup3Fax`. It can also occur when an application decodes a TIFF and re-encodes it using the default `TiffEncoder`, because ImageSharp retains TIFF frame metadata including the compression and bit depth. `TiffCompressorFactory` creates `T4BitCompressor` for `CcittGroup3Fax`. `TiffCcittCompressor.Initialize` allocates `Width * rowsPerStrip` bytes, but non-modified T4 writes a 12-bit EOL before row data and an additional 12-bit EOL per row. `WriteCode` calls `BitWriterUtils.WriteBit` and `WriteZeroBit`, both of which use `Unsafe.Add` without a capacity check. Thus the encoded bit stream can exceed the allocated span. A 1-pixel-wide, 2000-row alternating bilevel image caused a fatal `System.AccessViolationException` during T4 compression. This is a memory-corruption and availability issue for applications that expose this encoding flow to attacker-controlled input. ### Tested environment - Package binary: NuGet `SixLabors.ImageSharp` **4.1.1** - Target framework: `net8.0` - Runtime: .NET 8.0.30; SDK 8.0.424 - Operating system: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm), Linux arm64, Docker No active exploitation is known. ### Reproduction In a `net8.0` project that references the published `SixLabors.ImageSharp` 4.1.1 binary, save the following as `Program.cs`. Run `dotnet run -- exploit 2000` for the trigger and `dotnet run -- control 2000` for the control. ```csharp using System; using System.IO; using SixLabors.ImageSharp; using SixLabors.ImageSharp.Formats.Tiff; using SixLabors.ImageSharp.Formats.Tiff.Constants; using SixLabors.ImageSharp.PixelFormats; string mode = args.Length > 0 ? args[0] : "exploit"; int width = mode == "control" ? 64 : 1; int height = args.Length > 1 ? int.Parse(args[1]) : 2000; Console.WriteLine($"mode={mode} width={width} height={height}"); using var image = new Image<L8>(width, height); for (int y = 0; y < image.Height; y++) for (int x = 0; x < image.Width; x++) image[x, y] = new L8((byte)(((x + y) & 1) == 0 ? 255 : 0)); var metadata = image.Frames.RootFrame.Metadata.GetTiffMetadata(); metadata.BitsPerPixel = TiffBitsPerPixel.Bit1; metadata.Compression = TiffCompression.CcittGroup3Fax; using var output = new MemoryStream(); image.Save(output, new TiffEncoder()); Console.WriteLine($"Encoded OK: {output.Length} bytes"); ``` Against the published 4.1.1 package, this produced: ```text mode=exploit width=1 height=2000 Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. at ...TiffCcittCompressor.GetWhiteTermCode(...) at ...T4BitCompressor.CompressStrip(...) ``` A 64-pixel-wide, 2000-row control using the same Group 3 metadata completed successfully: ```text mode=control width=64 height=2000 Encoded OK: 76230 bytes ``` The direct public configuration path also triggers with: ```csharp new TiffEncoder { BitsPerPixel = TiffBitsPerPixel.Bit1, Compression = TiffCompression.CcittGroup3Fax }; ```

CWE-787Out-of-bounds Write (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #5
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Requirements · Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

WeaknessesCWE-787

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats